Welcoming Mitt Romney (and Mitt Romney) to Los Angeles

How many Mitt Romneys are there, anyway? With multiple positions on any given issue, it's hard to tell!

Eric C. Bauman, Chair of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party is joined by L.A. City Council President Eric Garcetti, Council Member Jan Perry and Maria Elena Durazo, Executive Secretary Treasurer of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor to welcome former Governor and corporate raider Mitt Romney to Los Angeles.

At the Nickel Diner in Downtown L.A. -- literally on Main Street -- these local leaders challenge Romney to get out of Beverly Hills and head into the rest of the city, where he could explain himself to the many people who'd be left further behind if he and his policies were in the White House.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Nickel
• Diner
• mitt
• romney
• YouTube
• Mitt Romney
• flip-flop
• flip flop
• Flip-flops
• Los Angeles
• 23469495

[JohnRhysMusician]

This is an embarrassment. I'll pass on the Nickel Diner next time I'm in DTLA.

[Zoobiesnot]

You are saying that the TARP BAILOUTS went to the wrong street? They should have went to Main St not Wall St? Ron = There should be no bailouts at all.

The next sentence doesn't read clearly. Something about electorate demographic.

Lastly, do me a favor. I'm Canadian. I'm worried for Canada in the next 5 years of ours, yours, and the world's economy.. Watch 3-5 videos of Ron's theories on the economies (keynesian or austrian) and then when you feel Patriotic, go vote for Ron for me.

[shadowofthewarriors]

@Zoobiesnot i see it. the difference is what sector of the economy money goes: main street or wall street.

Ron Paul's supporter demographic does not have to do with Obama's voter demographic or total demographic. That's democracy.

And you called slow improvement "slow tinkering" and not good enough.

But take into consideration that slow improvement is far better than fast dropping we saw earlier with Bush.

[Zoobiesnot]

@shadowofthewarriors

AND... You said "" more jobs being available means the economy is improving ""

To this, I answer that, maybe printing and handing out 6 TRILLION dollars caused a few jobs to pop up. Great deal there shadowofthewarriors. You know six trillion is 6 MILLION dollars TIMES a MILLION. So, you have a million dollars. You're rich for 3-4 lives! Well, Bush-Obama (the status quo as of late) printed and gave away that money away.. free.

And you don't see that?

[Zoobiesnot]

@shadowofthewarriors

#2

At the rate of the improvement that Obama or Romney are proposing, the globalists will be in 'glee', as they hand us a new Dollar, with a Chineese face on it.

In short - Obama is infected by Wall St, Globalists. Henry Kissenger for fucks sake, "NEW VERLD OARHDA".

Mittens the other day, went direct to Wall Street and lined his pockets in PAC money in a couple of hours.

Ron still gets more single-voter & military support. Tell me why that is.

[Zoobiesnot]

@shadowofthewarriors

#1

OK. I'll try again.

You are saying that Obama is slowly improving the economy, and that recently there has been a decrease in unemployment.

Big deal.

I say that, no tinkering around the edges is going to prepare the US, for the impending bankruptcy. Nope.

Ron Paul, personally-without an advisor like Kissenger or other Wall Street elite advisors, he himself knows & understands how economies work and don't work.

[shadowofthewarriors]

@Zoobiesnot All I see is you trying to switch the topic; you did not even make a point on that topic. All you just did (and have done several times already, whereas I have not) is call me nonsense.

Job growth is a mirror of an improving economy that people can trust. Therefore, job loss slowing and increasing (although slowly) is a sign of an economy beginning to improve.

[Zoobiesnot]

@shadowofthewarriors Again, more nonsense, and some type of shell game attempt to switch the topic.

Plainly, you have to admit, that unlike anything else that may be 'level', the deficit has not been and is currently not a static level line on a graph.

If job-growth was to be a mirror of all the recent deficit spending, then we'd all have lost our jobs 50 years ago.

The people who think there is another boom cycle coming wirh the US dollar are deluded. You will voting Lord Humongous in 2016.

[shadowofthewarriors]

@Zoobiesnot Sorry if there was miscommunication, i meant to say "cut the deficit by a trillion dollars."

This growth in the deficit is also reflected in our economy. It is currently level but not getting significantly better in the employment sector. But any good economist knows that that sector is last to improve.

And when he took office, the economy was tanking downward fast. Leveling off a drop logically precedes a boom cycle.

"Go do some reading."

[Zoobiesnot]

@shadowofthewarriors """ cut the trillion dollar deficit"""

Oh dear. You want me to help you to understand Libertarian philosophy and

Ron's plans, when you do not understand how much the deficit is.

1 TRILLION CUT IN YEAR ONE, out of the 16+ trillion already outstanding.

Be aware, that Obama allowed this deficit to grow by 4+ trillion during his 3 years in office. He isn't planning on making ant cuts to government spending, but for 1 trillion in the next 10 years.

Go do some reading.