CDK007 micro vs macro growth response

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
419 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 4, 2011

In CDK007's video entitled "micro vs macro growth", CDK007 cliams that micro and macro evolution are one in the same, just over a longer period of time. I explain how that can't be further from the truth, and request that CDK007 makes a video response giving an example of an organism evolving an entirely new structure that is new to the species, since he claims that macro evolution has been observed in the lab and in nature.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (micah1116)

  • what is the morphological difference between a human and a chimpanzee?

  • @babaganoug Good question. If you can, see if you can find out how many bones a chimpanzee has, from what I have seen chimps have around 300 bones, while humans have 206, that is the most obvious morphological difference. I can't find a good source for the number of bones a chimp has, so if that number is wrong, I want to be corrected. For some reason, it seems almost impossible to find that info.

  • @micah1116 you are incorrect. humans and chimp skeletons are homologous. just like a chihuahua and wolf skeleton.

  • @babaganoug If I'm incorrect, then can you please provide me with a source for the number of bones that a chimp has? I honestly, have not been able to find one If you could give me a source, I would greatly appreciate that

Video Responses

This video is a response to Micro vs. Macro Growth
see all

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Tell me, How did Algae Evolve Multicellularity in the lab?

  • @anglicantian

    Nothing can contradict a metaphysical research program that can accomodate all data.

  • @anglicantian

    "science fail"

    Yes you do fail, You thought just because something is published then it makes it true, This is how stupid you are.

  • @anglicantian there you go, just change the definition! LOL. It is due to a defect. Variation to existing structures has never caused new ones to arise. Changes to size, shape, or color will never cause an amphibian tetrapod to evolve digits and limbs. I never said anything about creationist websites, go look up info about selective breeding.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more