Bigfoot-Sewing it Up

The Patterson Gimlin Film costume examined in close detail.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Wikipedia
• Patterson
• Gimlin
• film
• bigfoot
• sasquatch
• brfo
• debunk
• debunked
• costume
• scientist
• reports
• real
• fake
• hoax
• nasi
• jeff
• meldrum
• matt
• moneymaker
• Loren
• coleman
• false
• report
• crytpid
• munns
• video
• solved
• scientific
• mk davis
• davis
• really
• dumb
• monster
• quest
• monsterquest
• history channel
• documentary
• D.W.
• Grieve
• Grover
• Krantz
• Washington
• Yakima
• California
• ray
• Wallace

[mig97217]

NG got the film from pattersons widow ;-)

There are no schoulder pads, the only thing you can see is a giant trapezius muscle. Sorry but i need a lot more than a blurry film. And so far i'm going with the original from pattersons widow ;-)

[DumDDumDum]

@mig97217

If you have read some of my other comments, you would have learned that Patterson's widow doesn't possess the original - hers too is a copy! The original may not exist or Gimlin may know where it is.

Please explain the tear on the arm, the string hanging, the elbow displacement, etc. You can't and neither has anyone else who has commented. So you choose to simply deny the possibility. That's ok. You are just another one of many.

[mig97217]

This is lame. You use one frame of a video that has been copied a million of times, and therefore not the original, but nevertheless you seem sure in your case.

After watching this i only see one seeing what he want to see. I always thought the patterson film was fake, but after watching National geographics American Paranormal, I actually believe that the movie is the real deal.

I would advise people to watch a serious documentary were the real film is beeing analysed, not a copy!

[DumDDumDum]

@mig97217 I'll put forth the idea to you that NG didn't have an original copy of the film taken by Patterson. You see, Bill Munns has noted that there is what I recognize as a "cat and dog" in the Patterson's wife copy and all other copies. How did it get there. Bill did an excellent job of comparing versions of the films and he believes the film is real. Watch the video where I show the cat and dog - hard to miss and much harder to explain.

[mig97217]

@DumDDumDum then you better prove that NG didnt get the real film from a bankbox..

Cat and dog?

So far i've not seen anyone who can fake the movement. And for me the most interesting thing is the creature(or man) is not turning it's head but turning it's whole body. Why is that? Well probably because of large trapzius muscles, like in ape's. A Gorilla or orangutang cant move it's neck like humans because of the large Trapz. Only thing i see is a blurry picture here, sorry :(

[DumDDumDum]

@mig97217 Different people possess copies of the film. NG could have gotten the film from any one of them.

Oddly the creature gets compared to apes. You noticed I hope the position of the elbow related to the hip is that of a human and not an ape. That can't be explained away with or without shoulder pads. But shoulder pads do restrict the relative motion of the head and body as you say you noticed.

[mig97217]

@DumDDumDum Sorry my mistake..

But i still fail to see anything in the blurry frames :-/

[craig79792000]

As much as I hate the fake videos of bigfoot where goobers draw in squatches out of bushes, this is in a way, worse. We know it is fake! Why go through all this trouble? Moneymaker has proven time and again to be a poser. He and BOBO the clown see a "squatch" at every turn. Could bigfoot be real, sure it could, but its probably not. And this film (P/G) is certainly a hoax, anyone who cant see that are seeing what they want to see and ignoring the obvious.

[muskratist]

A real unknown ape may not be structured like a gorilla,orangatang,or chimpanzee-or a giganthropus for that matter-but I doubt it would have flat feet like plywood cutouts,muscles that slipped and bulged out of position leaving it herniated, or eyes recessed into its head allowing only tunnel vision-how would it survive.....except in legend? Maybe that's it.....?

[DumDDumDum]

@cunnidvd

Try explaining what you have seen rather than criticize the author. If you can't explain it then why not accept what others see. As always, adverse criticism attacks the author and not the content. Just another whining loser.