Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Please, Please Me - The Beatles

John totally looks like a cowboy in this one.  
 
Customize

More From: jozefacik

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
756 ratings
Sign in to rate
533,275 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (6)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (693)   Options

Loading...
agnesona (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i don't think we can compare the beatles with elvis they have different styles of making music i like them both there are beatles music that i love and other music that i hate and the same with elvis... but i don't think that one is better than the other its all about preferences
heygirf12345000 (19 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
beatles rock:D
juanyz4 (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
alice cooper rules
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
bigdunk9 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Yes as an entertainer of course he can, it would be ignorant to say otherwise. Not to mention how incredibly influential he was, obviously you are entitled to your opinion. I just don't think he was as talented as The Beatles on several levels.
TomTresh3 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So you personally think the Beatles were more talented - that's fine, no one would deny you to that- but to say it as fact, and imply no one can think Elvis was better is a little weird.

I personally think both The Beatles and Elvis were two great talented artists, but prefer Elvis Presley's music.
bigdunk9 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
I never said that no one can think it, of course you can. The only point I made was that Elvis was not as musically talented as The Beatles, and that was nearly 3 weeks ago now. Nobody can question his place in music legacy, I will say again though Ringo was poor musically. Sick of these fans of Ringo who give my comments thumbs down and they haven't got a clue about music.
denadear (1 week ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
I think you have a point. It's like comparing Debbie Gibson to, what was that redhead's name, oh, yeah, Tiffany. Ha ha Anyway, Elvis sang. The Beatles sang, played instruments and wrote the music. Musically, The Beatles offered more talent. Elvis is entertaining, too, just not in so many avenues.
bigdunk9 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Exactly! Shame the vast majority of Elvis fans just see what they want to see.
StaraziaSelin66 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
BEATLES ARE BEST!! Don't deny it. They haven't been dead as long as Elvis has. XP

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.