Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,796
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2009

National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 5

  • likes, 50 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • UFOs crashed into the WTC. Wake Up people!

  • I think that the 9/11 Truthers are simply paranoid, anti-establishment whack jobs that jump to conclusions not fully supported by the evidence. They draw not the most likely explanations, but explanations that are extraordinary. Therefore, they need to present extraordinary evidence. I have not seen any such evidence.

see all

All Comments (251)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this chicks voice is the same one as in the film "Eagle Eye." another conspiracy with nat geo?WHHHAAAT???

  • Why should I belive these anti-establishment truthers? I have much more in common with the jewish billionairs that own the major news networks and nat geo. Why would jewish billionairs want to lie or hide information from people like me? I still believe that the Muslem terrorist passport did fall to the ground and end up in readable condition after the jet crash and explosion. Why would a jewish billionair want to lie to me about that?

  • google " who owns national geographic" wikipedia saids its FOX NEWS

  • These tests are so stupid......why dont they use a cutting charge which contains thermite

  • @strubinator Open your eyes and you will see! Can thermite of ANY type cut steel beams?!? I guess it CAN: watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

  • Instead of doing some half-ass thermite experiment with a flange and clay, why don't you talk about all the other stuff they have patented to cut through steel? They've got some really hi-tech shit out now.

  • Instead of doing some half-ass thermite experiment with a flange and clay, why don't you talk about all the other stuff they have patented to cut through steel? They've got some really hi-tech shit out now.

  • This video is total bullshit. You can see in the FEMA report, or whatever, the beams were attacked by something that ate right through them. Those fucking NIST nit-wits said explosives weren't used, and when asked if they checked for them they said they didn't even look. That's some investigation ya did there!. You've now got people that heard the 3-2-1 countdown for Bld. 7. Another guy heard the blast in Bld. 7, watched the windows blow out and the Bld. dropped. These guys are Govt shills.

  • @strubinator If those Toofers (like 1500 Architects, Engineers, Demolitions experts etc. etc.) from all over the world are simply paranoid, anti-establishment whack jobs, why not let them prove their case? All the Govt. keeps doing is hiding shit & killing testimony's. Ya know, it's pretty fucking bad when Bush's own hand picked 9,11 commission calls the 9,11 investigation a fraud. Even John Farmer, who was senior council for the 9,11 commission called the whole 9,11 investigation a lie.

  • Troofer Science: 1.)'Possibly' means 'Definitely' 2.) 'Could' means 'Did'. 3.) Imagination is data. 4.) Lack of evidence is evidence. 5.) Evidence is proof. 6.) There's always a top secret 'high tech' solution to your lack of evidence... oops! I meant evidence! And the Corollaries: a.)*Nobody* has ethics. Whistleblowers don't exist. b.) Foresight is 20/20 c.) Elevator upgrade teams are superhuman explosive experts who upgrade elevators *while* planting thousands of thermate charges.
View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more