First rebuttal part 1

My first rebuttal to Shwanerd. he will not respond, he's a moron I'm afraid

Category:

Education

Tags:

• shwanerd

[facilisdescenus]

One can believe in Abstract objects and be an atheist. Bertrand Russel did.

[migkillertwo]

well apparently Bertrand russel wasn't a physicalist.

[Knowntje]

"rethink my position on abortion "

I have to admit, that was very funny

[lilchrizz123]

Good rebuttal.

[Krensharpaw]

Knowntje , ok. As I said, it is hard to get what he is talking about in this. I mean I don't mind these type of debates, but he really needs to put more meat into this, or at least not hide it in the crap he goes o about.

Anyway, ty for pointing that out.

[Apologist325]

Numbers are abstract and mathematical. Not concrete and actual.

[Knowntje]

he does accept the big bang, he actually used it in defense of the kalam argument, he's not a creationist

[Krensharpaw]

So what is your evidence for saying it is your version of god? why could it not be Zeus or any other? Also, you don't believe in the big bang? yet there is evidence for it.. perhaps you should look that up.

[Krensharpaw]

you did make rather a lot of videos to his. Also, what is with the bs at the start of this video?

Also, you do reliaze that the big bang may not have been how the universe started. Also, why do we have to think there has to be a mind that lives outside of time and space? Why is it always that ppl base there argument on this subject? Also, the burden of proof is on the person who comes up with something not based on evidence. NOT the person who asked the question.

[CooFrank]

You are the best apologist ever...seriously. Keep up the good work.

[facilisdescenus]

Depends on what you mean. I think there is some kind of "pluralist physicalism' where abstract objects can exist. If you are just a materialist you can't believe in abstract objects.