9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 2 of 2

No description available.

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Bernadotte01]

So, in short.you can't offer any plausible candidate for the metal fire documented by NIST. UPS usually stand for Uninterruptible Power Supply, btw - and it's not a metal - it's main metal is usually LEAD (Pb), being essentially a battery. Most power supplies use copper (Cu) coils around an iron (Fe) core. Didn't you know that, wet one?

Which metal, exactly, can we set on fire? Will your fire produce white smoke and a torrent of molten iron, like at WTC?

[whetedge]

Considering there is strong evidence of a UPS (Universal Power System) on the 81st floor, and there are electrical storage systems on aircraft, and much of the contents of the impact zone, as well as the shredded aircraft, ended up in the NW corner, there was plenty of fuel to create the observable white flames. To leap to the conclusion "it can only be thermate" is a sign of a bigoted mind.

[whetedge]

You still haven't answered my question. Why did you lie?

[Bernadotte01]

Here's the photographic evidence that NIST presented, showing

QUOTE: *** METAL FIRE ***

at the south tower

v=xPjEoxV_HTM

1) What temperature would you estimate the white flame to be?

2) What metal would you suggest as the most rational candidate for the dazzling flame presented and discussed, but not explained, by NIST? In other words, what is your explanation for the flame, and can it be reproduced in the real world? Does your explanation produce molten iron as a byproduct?

[whetedge]

Why do feel it necessary to try and put down someone you are having a conversation with? Does it make you feel self important? Do you think it helps the worth of your argument? Actually, it's a sign of having no argument.

Joe Hill

[whetedge]

We were not discussing NIST. We were discussing a video, and the value (darkness or lightness) of the cladding in question is the same value as the cladding further down the building, which makes that particular piece of evidence invalid.

As for any brightly burning material, there is strong evidence of a UPC on the 81st floor, and airlines contain electrical storage units.

Now the question; why did YOU lie and claim I denied a NIST report?

Joe Hill

[whetedge]

Here's an example of Chandler's bigoted brilliance. He has one video which proves thermite because a piece of debris from one of the Towers suddenly did a 90 degree turn mid-air. He said it was due to a charge going off on the debris. Upon closer inspection of the video, it is evident the piece of debris collided with a heavier piece of falling debris. That type of sloppiness, swaying young impressionable minds over such a keystone issue is unforgivable. There are more such examples.

Joe Hill

[Rod Martin, Jr.]

Sorry, Joe, but you sound ridiculous telling others to ignore evidence. Chandler's evidence is not evidence, because you say so? That's cracked!

The evidence shouts CD. Would you claim that structural steel ever offers zero resistance? When 7WTC plummets at perfect free fall for 8 floors, then you have zero resistance. That's plenty of evidence of CD right there. You sound like a loony toon barking "Zero" evidence. Your accusations of "weak mindedness" merely reflect back onto you. Not pretty.

[Bernadotte01]

Do you get paid per word, or per lie?

Let's quote NIST.

===============

The intense fire in the northeast corner opening of the 81st floor is still present. An UNUSUAL FLAME is visible within this fire. In the upper photograph in Figure 9-44 a VERY BRIGHT WHITE FLAME, as opposed to the typical yellow or orange surrounding flames, which is generating a plume of white smoke, stands out.

[...] The brightness of the flame...suggests that some type of METAL IS BURNING.

-NIST

Why did you lie?