ROVER 214Si vs. BMW 320 (e46)

No description available.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• rover
• bmw
• 200
• 214
• e46
• 320

[ash7990]

i think the bmw ONLY JUST won, those 1.4 rovers are very fast for the engine size

[gman318]

Depends on weather it's a 320i or a 320d :P

The 320i would do 60mph in 8.2 secs

Whereas the 320d would take more like 10

[martinmartinstfc]

U can't get a vtr 16v that's a vts. And mine was a vtr and did beat it

[radionautomatic]

@martinmartinstfc If it's a VTR 16v then maybe, 8v'ers are slow as hell.

[jamiej2k6]

2 shit cars

[aqaboym]

@gman318 320d is 8.8 on paper, but that in the video is definitely 320i

[CroAuslander]

Everyone including me expected that bimmers suck at start, but the weakest point of every bimmer is the 3rd gear

[deanobeanobeano]

ive raced a lot of cars in my rover 214, they pull up to 40 in 1st very fast, whereas beemers lag off the line, i reckon a beemer would smash it past 70, but not before as this video shows

[martinmartinstfc]

Just like to say I have a vtr and that's faster than a rover 214. And a bm 318 is fastr than my vtr so that means the bm is faster than the rover end of.

[stephen88hox]

@theothertrainee 1.4 gti mpi would do 0-60 is 8ish seconds

[dragostrance]

@goldsgym1244 rover 214si is 400 kgs less than the beemer, which means 4 fat bastard friends less on your back seat. the beemer (150bhp) does 0-100 in 9.9 seconds and the 214si in 10.0 which is almost the same. I am just trying to point out that the 170bhp version which is 2 seconds faster is in another league.

[goldsgym1244]

@dragostrance and the rover has 98bhp lmao!