Uploader Comments (JaredPolin)
Top Comments
-
Sigma also now has a 200-500mm F:2.8 lens. it comes with a 2x converter making it a 400-1000mm. but the price of it is more expensive than several cars. just under 30k. lol
All Comments (31)
-
@dethmerc It's also the weight of several cars.
-
@BlueShirt7 The actual aperture would stay the same on a DX camera. However, the depth of field is deeper on a DX camera because the sensor is smaller. I believe F4 on DX is the same as F5.6 on FX. Remember, this is only depth of feild and will not affect the shutter speeds you can get at f4.
-
amazon.com says:
List Price: $8,400.00
Price: $6,999.95
-
i have afs 200 vr f2 and hardly ever used it , bought it for $6000 and after 4 years now there is a vr2. i regret buying it , cause it is heavy and inconvenient to use and if you take around ,you attract people and you can't enjoy shooting.
-
nano or Vr2 just marketing ploy
-
7000 !! omg !
-
You got the aperture scheme backwards.. nice job.
-
Jared Polin HALLO AGAIN! CAN YOU TELL ME YOUR OPINION ABOUT LEICA S SYSTEM?? IT GOOD CAMERAS OR JUST EXPENSIVE BUT NO PERFORMANCE?? THANKS
-
@dethmerc And how about the weight + Weather sealing....that lens is just so sick and so huge, I wonder where do you use it? :D
-
@JaredPolin how come.. I read that they also increase. can you explain this. appreciated
i have a question. if i put this lens on a DX cam. Then you get about 400 multiplied by 1.5 = 600mm. but what happens with the aperture? do i have to multiply it by 1.5 as well? is it "just" f6 then? thx.
BlueShirt7 1 year ago
@BlueShirt7 It would still stay the same.
JaredPolin 1 year ago
Chuck Norris would handle that lens with one finger.
ClankyRochet 1 year ago
@ClankyRochet actually, just with his mind!!!!
JaredPolin 1 year ago 25