Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Watts Up With Watts?

In July, as part of my "Climate Denial Crock of the Week" video series, (http://www.youtube.com/user/g reenman3610) I published a piece that criticized and parodied the work of well known climate d...  
 
Customize

More From: greenman3610

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
655 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,097 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (760)   Options

Loading...
allieron (4 days ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
@steffenla4
"Deniers" is the correct term. They're NOT skeptics, because there is nothing to be skeptical about, only some tiny details and improvements.
Watt's is a Denier in every sense of the word, as are all the other happy-clapping drones who trot like sheep to the Denier mantra that "It's all about taxing us and establishing a NWO...."

Plus, "Denier" sounds more polite than "clueless moron".
steffenla4 (4 days ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
"tiny details" that's cute.
"clueless moron" not so much...
thewholesoul (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
hey green read the copenhagen treaty you idiot. they are setting up a wold government that we will be paying our taxes to.

no taxation without representation.
ubrew12 (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
oh, so THAT's why the science of climatology is factually bankrupt! THANKS!!! (science is science. Policy is policy. Try to distinguish between them, you fool.) On the subject of policy, I suspect that as long as corporate interests can practice business across borders without restriction, people who live in actual countries will forever be preyed upon. I don't believe in 'one world government', but if you want to prevent it, reign in the ability of corporations to move across borders.
FreeAgain2 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
This comment is exactly right.

And it has hurt the AGW side in the long run.
Martintfre (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
so what was said about Mr Watt at 1:42..I didn't quite hear that..
sto12m (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
nice photoshop job on the news site...what exactly was that point of that?
sto12m (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
now your not even Stating new points..i don't care about what you already covered in your 2nd or 3rd video...
steffenla4 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
And I agree that true scientists are objective skeptics. My problem is that I don't see a whole lot of that in the pro AGW camp. Bogus science on the other hand...
pseudotruth (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
steffenla4

Bad science - from CRU emails
'maybe McKitrick has figured out the difference between radians and degrees this time!'

'Loehle, McIntyre. Funny--w/ each awful paper E&E publishes, McIntyre realizes that
it compromises the integrity of his own "work" even further.'

'Many have simply dismissed the Baliunas et al pieces because, from a scientific point of view, they are awful--that is certainly true. For example...'

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.