Evolution is REAL Science #3

Basic virology combined with cutting-edge molecular research leads us to a powerful explanation of a large set of biological observations. These observations only make sense using the REAL science of evolution.

Visit our website at: http://www.anevolvingcreation.net/standup/blog.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• biology
• science
• erv
• endogenous
• retrovirus
• virology

[standup4REALscience]

As the maker of this video, I'm disappointed that you would seemingly assume that I do not believe in God.

I am a Christian. I personally believe that the scientific theory of evolution is an accurate description of the process that God used to create life on Earth, including human beings.

The reason that evolution is seen as contrary to belief in God is because some Christians apparently worship their personal interpretation of the Bible rather than the God the claim to believe in.

How sad.

[1n354a]

if it wasn't science that created the world, then it must have be(en) God.

what about the large, undetectable, invisible Cheese monkey who lives three feet outside the edge of the universe in an oversized brown bag? I actually think that he is the one who did it....unless you can prove that he doesn't exist?

[OurLucylocket]

@pmoyer50 they may well do when we are long extinct..there has been many pre-human kind evolved before now, but you will not be here to see it matey.. !! lol

[pmoyer50]

Evolution is an inexact science. I guess the monkeys in zoos will one day evolve into humanoids, huh? God created all what is seen and unseen.

[hamzah938]

ATTENTION: (TheRationalizer): Your 'knee jerk reaction' to block me shows your immaturity & inability to disagree with your fellow man. Your accusation of 'threat by proxy' was non-existent and after your statement and use of the 'F' word, I tried to clarify my point, but you had blocked me. --YOU ARE WEAK-- ! ! ! ! !

[TheRationalizer]

@standup4REALscience

I didn't think you would :-)

In that case I am curious, what do you think is the purpose of the story of Adam and Eve, and do you think the default position is for humans to *not* go to heaven (if so, for what reason?)

[standup4REALscience]

You're correct. I don't subscribe to that idea.

[123backinyerface]

Rational discussion about what "Jesus" did or didn't say should stop when its understood that "Jesus" was a mythical character used by various religious scribes and scholars to relay their historical 2 cents with. i.e. 'Jesus' said whatever the person writing the text, wanted 'him' to say.

[TheRationalizer]

@standup4REALscience

I am born guilty because of something Adam and Eve did.

[standup4REALscience]

@TheRationalizer Well, it depends on what you mean by "original sin."

[TheRationalizer]

@standup4REALscience

Am I correct in assuming you don't subscribe to the idea of "original sin"?

[standup4REALscience]

@raponte1955 We agree that Jesus was addressing people with very little scientific knowledge. The passage I referenced was not a figure of speech. That's what people of the time really believed. The idea that humans share common ancestry with other living things would have been as foreign to them as the notion that the stars are actually massive, luminous balls of plasma held together by gravity. He was speaking in terms they could understand using scriptures they would have been familiar with.