How a pusher can be destroyed in 45 minutes (Kvitova vs Wozniacki), part 4

Kvitova vs Wozniacki 6-2 6-0 (Wimbledon 2010, 4th round)

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• petra
• kvitova
• caroline
• wozniacki
• tennis
• wta
• wimbledon
• czech
• republic
• denmark

[camaranina]

As for my previous comment that was a response to a comment about Ana Ivanovic.

[QuadThreat85]

@juancarlos772652 man we all know that she hasn't shown up GS wise yet, but other than that, you'd have to be blind to not see Azarenka's consistent rise since she came on the scene.

[aonutube]

This kitchen looks really green.

[slatz20]

How in earth Woznicki became No. 1? lol

[morriganblane]

So the pusher finally lost the #1, what a relief. Just drop 4 or 5 more places and women's tennis will be on its way of redemption :D

We are lucky to have Azarenka and Kvitova to keep her away from the Grand Slams and the #1. Clijsters and Serena won't be here forever to save the WTA...

[MMM18092]

Caro didn't even push very well in this match.

[TheAwareish]

Its scary because she even beat Azarenka like a dog. I cant wait to see Serena Fit because thats the only person I think smart and strong enough to outbplay here massive game. She's Maria with all the upgrades... not cocky, lefty, great mover, no noise, and even bigger smoother game on both wings.

[azby19281]

No wonder why Petra won Wimbledon, gotta love her. Hopefully she wins the Australian next.

[QuadThreat85]

@juancarlos772652 Go grab a dictionary and look up the words basically and practically If she turned pro in 2003, and she only played junior and ITF tennis from 2003 to mid-2006, then that does mean practically or basically every year she's played...DO THE MATH (unless lawyers can't add). She's been a pro for 8 years, and for almost 6 of those years she has been climbing the rankings & beating top players along the way.

[juancarlos772652]

@QuadThreat85

Here you go again ... changing your words. This is what you originally wrote yourself, "umm Azarenka (minus having not won a slam yet) has had good years basically every year she's played!". Basically EVERY year she's played, and now you're saying "minus the first few where she turned pro ... " You definitely have a major inconsistency there.

By the way, working in a law practice DOES keep me busy.

[QuadThreat85]

@juancarlos772652 OK unlike at least half of youtube (probably including you), I actually have things to do that keep me away from the computer for extended periods of time.

But if you can't admit that Azarenka is having good years (minus the first few where she turned pro and played primarily on the junior circuit!), then yes...I do give up.

[QuadThreat85]

@juancarlos772652 Go read again...I didn't say every year...I said practically. And most people with sense consider what she's been doing good years...I may not agree with rankings, but they do show one thing: If you're in the the top 10 and staying there, you are for sure having good years...if you're winning slams, you're having a great year.

With all that said, the girl has been improving with each year, so there's nothing that says to me that she won't win slams.