Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

UCLA's Lee Ohanian: Hoover, Roosevelt and the Great Depression

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,773
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 26, 2010

Lee E. Ohanian, a UCLA professor of economics and authority on financial crises, presented the. Jan. 8, 2010, Jacob Marschak Interdisciplinary Colloquium On Mathematics in the Behavorial Sciences at UCLA. Ohanian detailed his research on policies by presidents Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt that he says catapulted a bad recession into the Great Depression and stalled recovery for years. In both cases, attempts to restrict competition led to the disastrous economic outcomes. For more information on the research, visit http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/pandering-to-labor-caused-great-91447.aspx and http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409...

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Fantastic lecture... learned a lot.

  • Dr. Marder:

    Very interesting but the information presented here doesn't convince me. Ohanian claims that the price of labor was too high and that it presented a gap between deflating prices, that corporations were squeezed between having pledged to President Hoover to maintain high wages while the deteriorating macroeconomic situation forced them to lower the prices they charged for their products.

    1) I'm not convinced that these wages were 'high' to begin with, or were indeed maintained.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 'distorting market forces and incentives' 'inefficient' are these code words?

    I think this fellow unwittingly revealed his underlying bias when he made a comment 'what if McDonalds paid its workers $500 and hour?'

    Oh, how terrible! How could you possibly pay somebody running around like a headless chicken in a hot kitchen that much?

    It's inefficient to pay workers anything close to a living wage...but paying CEOs millions, that's efficient, that's not a distortion, is it?

  • 2) very significant advances in worker productivity had taken place in the 1920s, overall, workers in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, railways went up an average of 76%. On average did worker pay increase by a similar percentage during this time period? Doesn't seem to be borne out.

    3) deflation in the Depression could vary from 12% to 30%; wages fell much, much lower. If a labor wage gap was the culprit in Ohanian's 'whodunit' why didn't corporations go on a hiring spree at this point

  • You're awesome! Great lecture. Murray Rothbard writes something similar to this.

  • @pdxpumped

    econ.yale.edu/seminars/echist/­eh02/ohanian-021008.pdf

    Other paper.

  • econ.ucla.edu/people/papers/Oh­anian/Ohanian499.pdf

    Here is the paper.

  • brilliant lecture

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more