Phil Plait - Bring it On

Phil Plait had some interesting words at the TAM 8 meeting.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Plait
• TAM8
• TAM
• The
• Amazing
• Meeting
• Bring
• It
• On
• Don't
• Be
• Dick
• Bad
• Astronomy
• Astronomer
• MoonFaker
• Operation
• Dirty
• Trick
• Apollo
• Fire
• moon
• landing
• hoax
• conspiracy
• theory
• Possible
• Actions
• to
• Provoke
• Harass
• Or
• Disrupt
• Cuba
• William
• H.
• Craig
• CIA
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[zoroaster1973]

phil is like...gazillion times more educated than any of you who created/liked this video...just listen to any of his q & ba post on yt abd you will get my drift.

btw... "no landing on moon" is sooo refuted... leave it at rest, please

[LeeRoy3535]

Phil Plait is very polite. Whoever made this video is a deluded nut bar.

[KyrreKausrud]

Dear maker of this video, have you taken into consideration that are really being rude, not taking no for an answer, forcing yourself on him with a hidden camera and sounding offended that he hasn't taken the time to respond to your particular epiphany. From Plait's perspective he has debated with about 3420 moon hoaxers like you and by the time you come along as nr. 3421 he may just be a bit tired and rather want to have a chat with his pals? Deal with it.

[haydenmossop]

bring it phil bring it

[jlecelec]

The person who made this video, needs to speak to a psychiatrist because the radio beams you are picking up in your fillings are telling you lies..

[Tweekerhead]

@Tweekerhead 1rad=62.4x106 MeV is WRONG. It's 1rad=10^6 MeV

The six is an exponent you can't even get a simple notation right.

I estimate 6billion MeV hit Earth a year from Cosmic Rays,

That's 6,000,000,000 MeV a year.

That would hardly light a 100 watt bulb.

[Tweekerhead]

@Daddyo930 Is it your wacky emotional bias that restricts you from reading with any discernible comprehension?

I figured out yesterday that when you make your assertions on the Cosmic rays you're using your blundered notation. You think that 1rad = 6614.4MeV.

If that was the case we'd all be dead.

[Daddyo930]

@Tweekerhead You should stop. As a matter of fact we will until you answer this question. Are you familiar with remote viewing?

[Tweekerhead]

@Daddyo930 I should have stated that the percentages & composition of GCR's I posted was of energies at or below 10¹³ eV values.

I know how pedantic you can be with your data....LOL

Who has bad science?

[Tweekerhead]

@Daddyo930 Bad science? Coming from a guy who said"1rad=62.4x106MeV" or that the Magnetosphere stops gamma rays, you aren't in any position to tell anyone about science, especially me.

You are very wrong about the composition of GCR's, where'd you get your information?

Mine comes from the Fly's Eye Obs.Utah,I have a friend there.

GCR's consist of:

protons 50%

αlpha particles 25%

C,N,O nuclei 13%

electrons 1%

Gamma ray radiation ≤ 0.1%

You should stop, I know this stuff, you don't