Beck Reveals Hillary's Misinformation About Margaret Sanger (Eugenics) & Thomas Jefferson (Slaves)

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• margaret
• sanger
• thomas
• jefferson
• glenn
• beck
• slaves
• eugenics
• hillary
• clinton

[bengchicago]

@joemomma824 That is why we have a special term for this kind of dishonesty - propaganda. Its a bit more sophisticated than simply making things up. By the way, his presentation of Sanger is a perfect example of this.  What do you think the impression he intends the viewer to come away with is in this video? That, based on this WKKK meeting, Sanger was a KKK supporter? A KKK hero, perhaps? A KKK comrade? Do you assume any of these impressions to be accurate?

[silverflyt]

@types10000 Anyone completing the 5th grade should be able to recall information they care about. The fact that I've been out of college now for 10 years more than qualifies me enough to speak in complete sentences and carry on a fact filled dialogue. If you can't tell by now that I've no use for copy&paste text then I worry for your sanity.

[types10000]

@silverflyt

" If her legacy excluded Eugenics, I'd hang a photo of her above my mantle."

- once-again, whilst i fully accept that she was an advocate of performing passive eugenics on the retarded, you asserted that she was an advocate of racial sterilization and this is simply not the case.

[types10000]

@silverflyt

"And further more, the longer this conversation, the further your comprehension seems to descend into obscurity."

trying to project your own stupidity onto others will not help you.

- Neither the newspaper headline nor the extract from TPOC you provided support your assertion of racial sterilization

PROVIDE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR CLAIM.

[types10000]

@silverflyt

"Why are you pretending that YouTube allows direct URL copy/pasted text??Don't be lazy. The knowledge does not exist in a vacuum. "

incorrect, all you have to do is structure your links like this:

YOURWEBSITE[.]com

[types10000]

@silverflyt

"Excuse me - please try to follow me this time. I have not copied and pasted articles."

- your original statement argument was a copy copy-paste, they claimed the same thing you, tried to use the same things as evidence and failed to provide evidence to backup their assertions (just like you).

[types10000]

@silverflyt

"The headline is purely a reference point for those who would like to read on thissubject... For someone who insists on "proof" you sure do behave strangely up receiving specific newspaper articles"

- i was simply pointing-out that your use of it was incorrect, you stated it demonstrated her advocation of racial eugenics, but it does not.

"Read the article for yourself"

- i have and it does not support what you claim.

[silverflyt]

@types10000 And further more, the longer this conversation, the further your comprehension seems to descend into obscurity. My VIEW is only, Eugenics is an all or nothing philosophy, and this is why i simply cannot sing Sanger's praises.  You are either for racial supremacy through the selective breeding process or you aren't. Its kind of like being pregnant. There's no such thing as just a being "just little bit." If her legacy excluded Eugenics, I'd hang a photo of her above my mantle.

[silverflyt]

@types10000 Why are you pretending that YouTube allows direct URL copy/pasted text??Don't be lazy. The knowledge does not exist in a vacuum.

[silverflyt]

@types10000 Excuse me - please try to follow me this time. I have not copied and pasted articles. You asked for my references, I gave you the titles of published documentation I read that existed prior to present day propaganda. Nothing I read or discussed was written before 1950. My statements have nothing to do with tabloids, gossip, hearsay or a the pro-life platform. Simply regularly insisting that I am making up stories isn't going to make it true on your end.

[silverflyt]

@types10000 New York times= tabloids. Under what theory??? The headline is purely a reference point for those who would like to read on thissubject. For someone who insists on "proof" you sure do behave strangely up receiving specific newspaper articles. Read the article for yourself I gave the date previously.As for TPOC. It calls for the use of Eugenics to create a master race. A race that certainly does not include the "INFERIOR" of ANY TYPE. AS you acknowledge in 1920 that includes blacks.