Sad, Sad, Doubting John

amazing video, thanks

This song is objectionable in the eyes of DOROS. Convert to the cult of DOROS to save your immortal soul

Clipsde

No 'confusion'-just disappointment. I for one would love to hear Turkel make this big an ass of himself in a video rather than text.

Kind of easily amused and rather misanthropic aincha ?

Stupid, out of tune, unimaginative, fictional or delusional recounting-(take your pick), arrogant-(I guess that's not news in regards to anything from Halting and his flying monkeys),
and an indication that some one has

way too much free time.

Do you send money to his 'ministry' ?

SO MUCH ROFLDRAMA!!!

Hey "BibleApologetics" / Mr. Manata, can you answer a question for me?

I have been searching Bahnsen's literature to try to uncover what epistemological theory he held to. The most I have found is "Revelational Epistemology" in which we know things by God's revelation in scripture. Aside from this somewhat awkward view that makes God' commands arbitrary (if by command alone they are true) this seems to imply pseudo-coherentism...

.....Namely, that basic beliefs (axioms) can be justified by other beliefs. The problem with coherentism is that it leads to an infinite regress. In regard to the laws of logic, for example the regress would go as follows:

We can only prove the laws of logic by God,
to prove the laws of logic, in order
to prove God, in order
to prove the laws of logic, in order
to prove God, ....ad infinitum.

Is there a way in which you synthesize the much stronger, better attested theory of epistemic justification (Foundationalism) with the TAG; does bahnsen?

Isn't it more rational to suppose that because universals are beyond our experience, and our available beliefs by experience that we do not "know" them in a sense? We merely use them in order to reason with our beliefs?  ..That is to say, that they are indeed axioms of experience which are not grounded by other beliefs, lest they regress.

It seems most rational to try to synthesize foundationalism and universals, given that coherentism has failed so miserably and can be argued and dismissed by most secular philosophers with ease. I am interested to here from you on this issue, I hope it is fun to answer! Send me a YT message.

Take care and God Bless.

interesting

What a queer thing to say.