Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Gun Control

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
44,562
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 6, 2007

The number of well-publicized public shootings during the past few years, especially the tragedy at Columbine High School, has re-energized the gun control movement. As a show of strength, a coalition of gun control groups has organized a "Million Mom March" to be held in Washington, D.C. on Mother's Day, an event designed to stir up emotions rather than promote rational thought. And when one looks at the facts about gun control, it's easy to see why the anti-gun lobby relies on emotion rather than logic to make its case.

Think you know the facts about gun control? If your only source of information is the mainstream media, what you think you know may not be correct. Take the quiz below and test your knowledge.

David Lampo is the publications director at the Cato Institute.

1. Thousands of children die annually in gun accidents.

False. Gun accidents involving children are actually at record lows, although you wouldn't know it from listening to the mainstream media. In 1997, the last year for which data are available, only 142 children under 15 years of age died in gun accidents, and the total number of gun-related deaths for this age group was 642. More children die each year in accidents involving bikes, space heaters or drownings. The often repeated claim that 12 children per day die from gun violence includes "children" up to 20 years of age, the great majority of whom are young adult males who die in gang-related violence.

2. Gun shows are responsible for a large number of firearms falling into the hands of criminals.

False. Contrary to President Clinton's claims, there is no "gun show loophole." All commercial arms dealers at gun shows must run background checks, and the only people exempt from them are the small number of non-commercial sellers. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, at most 2 percent of guns used by criminals are purchased at gun shows, and most of those were purchased legally by people who passed background checks.

3. The tragedy at Columbine High School a year ago illustrates the deficiencies of current gun control laws.

False. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold violated close to 20 firearms laws in amassing their cache of weapons (not to mention the law against murder), so it seems rather dubious to argue that additional laws might have prevented this tragedy. The two shotguns and rifle used by Harris and Klebold were purchased by a girlfriend who would have passed a background check, and the TEC-9 handgun used by them was already illegal.

4. States that allow registered citizens to carry concealed weapons have lower crime rates than those that don't.

True. The 31 states that have "shall issue" laws allowing private citizens to carry concealed weapons have, on average, a 24 percent lower violent crime rate, a 19 percent lower murder rate and a 39 percent lower robbery rate than states that forbid concealed weapons. In fact, the nine states with the lowest violent crime rates are all right-to-carry states. Remarkably, guns are used for self-defense more than 2 million times a year, three to five times the estimated number of violent crimes committed with guns.

5. Waiting periods lower crime rates.

False. Numerous studies have been conducted on the effects of waiting periods, both before and after the federal Brady bill was passed in 1993. Those studies consistently show that there is no correlation between waiting periods and murder or robbery rates. Florida State University professor Gary Kleck analyzed data from every U.S. city with a population over 100,000 and found that waiting periods had no statistically significant effect. Even University of Maryland anti-gun researcher David McDowell found that "waiting periods have no influence on either gun homicides or gun suicides."

6. Lower murder rates in foreign countries prove that gun control works.

False. This is one of the favorite arguments of gun control proponents, and yet the facts show that there is simply no correlation between gun control laws and murder or suicide rates across a wide spectrum of nations and cultures. In Israel and Switzerland, for example, a license to possess guns is available on demand to every law-abiding adult, and guns are easily obtainable in both nations. Both countries also allow widespread carrying of concealed firearms, and yet, admits Dr. Arthur Kellerman, one of the foremost medical advocates of gun control, Switzerland and Israel "have rates of homicide that are low despite rates of home firearm ownership that are at least as high as those in the United States." A comparison of crime rates within Europe reveals no correlation between access to guns and crime.

The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason. Let's hope more people are catching on.

song by Ty england

  • likes, 29 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Dominick629)

  • In an ideal world I think gun control is a good thing, there really is no valid argument against this. However in the U.S. the horse has already bolted. Gun control would have little impact on gun crime as there are now so many in circulation.

  • @MrAnthropophagy """"In an ideal world I think gun control is a good thing, there really is no valid argument against this.""""

    No such thing as an ideal world. Keep thinking that there is one and you'll find yourself extremely disappointed.

Top Comments

  • @Dominick629 Amen Brother! When the hell will these idiots look at History and see what's happened to EVERY Country that's ever implemented a Gun Ban? If the Gun control laws work WHY is it that every single place that has them watch's their Crime rate GO UP? I wonder if this Puppet for Pollipukes would feel that way if it was their Sister, Mother or Loved one that was Beat and Raped for 14 hours AFTER the Police were called? Do they know there's NO LAW saying Police have to protect citizens?

  • @RZMaslic Hunting. Target shooting. Protection of myself. Protection of my family. A deterrent to government tyranny, which coincidentally America has always had the 2nd amendment for just this purpose, and by some strange coincidence, we are the freedom capital of the world, and the most powerful nation on the planet. All politics and war mongering aside, i think that's pretty significant.

see all

All Comments (1,511)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @anyoneGOTcommonSENSE thank you, history is incredibly important.

  • #6 - the argument that is used is that "when guns are banned, GUN crime goes down". This, by itself, is true. However, crime by any method, gun, knife, fist, rope, car, sheer numbers, ect, goes UP. Grandma is a lot less threatening without her colt.

    Suicide rates, in similar fashion, shift from guns to jumping, strangulation, ect. Yes, suicide by gun is a lot harder when you can't legally get a gun, so they jump instead. Devils in the details.

  • @Dominick629...where in my statement did i say i believed there is an ideal world? In fact my next sentence suggests otherwise.

  • @darris321 So, are you advocating against personal ownership of guns because people aren't murdered every time they are robbed or raped? Sounds like a pretty thin argument to me, but if thats what you are going with don't be suprised when it crumbles under its own weight like a 1200 pound man.

  • @RZMaslic Well, the .357 mag is my middle of the night gun in case a bad guy breaks in (known to happen in the real world), and the 9mm springfield is my wife's middle of the night gun. The 12 guage is the quick backup gun for me or the wife in case more fire power is needed. My rifles are for hunting, collecting, and protecting the neighborhood after a natural disaster, riots, or gov't abuse. I lived through May 3 in Moore, OK and know that even here, armed guards are necessary after an event.

  • @MrAnthropophagy There is no such thing as an ideal world or perfect gun control. Even if all guns were melted down for scrap, the ability of a man to produce a gun is still there. Actually, I know that there are several local gunsmiths who make all of their rifles themselves so that they never have to do through any gov't red tape. Also, the only defense against a gun (and I've proven you can't get rid of guns or other weapons) is a gun. Gun control would take away your only defense.

  • 10 terrorists armed with guns massacred 166 people and wounded 293, via 10 coordinated attacks in Mumbai on Nov 26 2008.

    If even a dozen of the victims were basic trained legal owners of semi automatic pistols how many fellow citizen could the terrorists have killed before being gunned down by them? The state can never guarantee against random acts of violence (its not supposed to) & being so limited/incapable it fails against organized violence as well. What is the common man to do?

  • @RZMaslic Because we are free and not slaves

  • @RZMaslic

    the reason for me owning a gun is this.....because it is my god given right to defend myself whenever i need to (not when someone tells me i can)....because i do NOT want to be the one carried away in a buddy bag (when seconds count,a cop is just minutes away)....because everything i own ,i have worked hard for and i do not intend to let a low life take it from me and yes of course for the weekly target practice .....that why i own a gun

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more