Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Charlie Rose - Calorie Restriction part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,436
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 29, 2007

Charlie Rose interviews the leading experts on calorie restriction and it's relationship to life expectancy.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It's pretty infuriating when we're spending billions on war and barely allot and money to longevity research.

  • Because "rates" imply the incidence of something inversely proportional to time. Delaying something means you are saying you have the same incidence of something over a greater unit of time, hence the rate is less. In reality, calorie restriction not only delays disease onset, but entirely prevents many types of pathologies. You have fewer ways to die, which is also one of the reasons you live longer.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My rosacea almost disappeared a few months into raw CR. Inflammation is controlled with less cooked foods. They haven't mentioned the importance of o2 in all disease and aging. Low o2 environment causes cancer and aging. Raw foods are loaded with o2, whereas cooked foods and animal products have almost none. We were also meant to swim and drink moving water, which is loaded with h2o2, another source of o2.

  • all this talk sounds like an infomercial YOU CAN DO THIS, AND HOW AMAZING WOULD IT BE IF YOU COULD... AND BLAH BLAH BLAH, shame that people who call themselves scientists talk about non specific wishful thinking crap

  • One discovery that could simultaneously delay or stop diseases? Sounds like a great loss to several companies. Would that discovery, if any, be allowed to surface?

  • caloric restriction may work but it could also be carbohydrate restriction aswell....

  • Yes, the Constitution guarantees you the right to research longevity. Fool.

  • It's not so bad. If you pick the right foods the bulk of what you eat can actually increase.

  • Please provide links to this "evidence". I would think that "yo-yo-ing" would be worse than getting the same number of calories on a daily basis.

  • Is longevity research now a right guaranteed in the Constitution?

  • There is evidence that completely fasting one day and then stuffing yourself the next can do the same for extending a human life. I suppose you'd still be opposed to the restriction of calories though.

    Remember, many serious CR practitioners eat 1900 calories instead of 2500 (the recommended governmental caloric) calories per day. A 600 calorie cut is not much at all, especially if you are eating the right foods.

  • Excellent answer.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more