Babies deserve to burn in hell

How messed up do your values have to get for you to accept this ludicrous idea?
The religious mind is capable of defying our inbuilt moral compass.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• baby
• burn
• hell
• infant
• christian
• fundamentalist

[polycarp256]

...

[imaginenoreligion]

@polycarp256 I know the theology. You haven't told me anything I've not heard before. I just happen to think it's bullshit. I understand your argument and your position.

I do not agree with them. Get over it!

[imaginenoreligion]

@polycarp256 I don't believe I spelled sacrifice incorrectly.

We all deserve hell. Really? So the guy who hardly ever does anything to harm anyone else but finds it impossible to believe christian theology goes to hell and the rapist that repents goes to heaven?

Is there free will in heaven? Is there evil in heaven? Yeah, it doesn't make sense does it?

Get a grip!

[imaginenoreligion]

@polycarp256 Now you claim to know who is and who is not a christian... judge not :)

[imaginenoreligion]

@polycarp256 Killer point, well done. I am not a sheep. I don't need to know Richard Dawkins' opinion on something before I form my own. I doubt that he holds the opinion that you suggest, but it would make little difference to me either way.

[polycarp256]

@imaginenoreligion Also, this hard Agnostic Atheism you are espousing is highly cowardly. Even Richard Dawkins agrees with that.

[polycarp256]

@imaginenoreligion Where I take offence is that this man, who claims that infants deserve to burn in Hell, you assume is a Christian at all. Any "christian" who takes any arrogant non-compassionte stance towards Hell is no Christian at all. So to label him as "this one" assuming "one" refers to Christian is disengenuous. Which again highlights your ineptness of Christian theology.

[polycarp256]

@imaginenoreligion this is why Jesus is refered to as the second Adam in Romans. Christians also believe "no man seeks God" and that "no man is righteous", therefore none other than God himself has blood pure enough to be sacraficed as a worthy atonement for man's depravity. Once again, you are not a theologian, philosopher, or Biblical historian. You are a Youtube pundit who regurgitates fallicious misinformation about the Christian faith.

[polycarp256]

@imaginenoreligion "God sent himself as a blood sacrafice to himself". Exactly. Christians who read their Bible know that "the wages of sin is death" therefore someone has to die because of sin and because Adams sin carries over to all humanity all are born into sin and therefore deserving of hell,

[imaginenoreligion]

@polycarp256 You need only read the bible to realise that christian theology does not make sense. God sent himself as a blood sacrifice to himself so that people (who deserve it?) can avoid being eternally tortured in hell.

Tell me what part makes sense.