Obama Calls for Class Warfare in State of the Union

There are a lot of people out there who embrace class warfare and think that rich should pay their fair share. But what constitutes fair? Find out as Zo looks at Obama's efforts to spread the wealth around.

See more at http://www.pjtv.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• pjtv
• pj media
• zonation
• alfonzo rachel
• macho sauce
• state of the union
• class warfare
• conservative
• liberal
• republican
• democrat
• gop
• senator
• congressman
• congress
• white house
• president
• barack obama
• left wing
• power
• influence
• politics
• talk
• press
• reform
• discussion
• rich
• wealthy
• jobs
• job
• fair share
• rhetoric
• constitution
• rights
• tax
• taxes
• income
• entitlement
• election
• college
• tuition

[ValkyereHowie]

@ilIuminaughty Yes your right, if there are any conspiracies by the rich I probably have no clue as I am not "in the circle". Enlighten me great one.

[ValkyereHowie]

@TheRichsalIey I expect it to eventually happen because simply history repeats itself, this has happen an uncountable number of times and unpredictable events occur. Right now it seems impossible, but that is only on our extremely limited radar screen. Change happens abruptly and rapidly.

[ValkyereHowie]

@TheRichsalIey True, but still many wealthy and powerful kings were offed. And of course the US hasn't had many rebellions, we are a very young nation and still we've already had the Civil War which nearly wrecked us. You can always say "Well this is a different scenario, the US is strong" you don't think the Roman empire felt that way for a long time? Where are they now? Nothing lasts forever and no one rules forever.

[ilIuminaughty]

@ValkyereHOwie

You really don't know do you? No wonder I'm walking all over you. Admit your ignorance and i'll explain everything.

[TheRichsalIey]

@ValkyereHowie

So how do you expect them to ever do this when the support is so little for them and they're at their weakest?

[TheRichsalIey]

@ValkyereHowie cont

The other strongest point was during the 60's (which wasn't NEARLY as strong as the civil war). Of which again no liberation or overthrow of Government or the rich

[TheRichsalIey]

@ValkyereHowie Kings weren't always rich or that powerful. A leader of a mountain village could be considered a king and assassinated. But when you compare that to a Country that has been rich for DECADES and has the world's strongest military by it's side AND the support of it's people, it's not going to work. As I said, the strongest point ever of a rebellion was the Civil war (Which unless you agree with slavery was an injustice war).

[ValkyereHowie]

@TheRichsalIey Rebellions have taken out the wealthy through out history. Kings decapitated by peasants, French Revolution, etc. There is a limit on how greedy the wealthy can be before retribution.

[ValkyereHowie]

@ilIuminaughty Lol! Let's say there was some type of top secret conspiracy to get rid of the poor. All that means is the rich are incredibly stupid and wish to be forced to do mediocre jobs. It's like a pharaoh killing his slaves... And if that were the case it would only mean a rebellion would be easier as the rich would clearly not be very bright...

[QuasarX]

Also, the 16th amendment was never ratified, and therefore isn't actually part of the Constitution. That's why the only Republican candidate I'm willing to vote for, under any circumstances, is one who I can trust to do everything within his power to end the IRS, and that's Ron Paul. If the Republican party nominates Romney, Gingrich, or Santorum, I'll have no choice but to vote against the Republican party in the general election... and I know many other people who feel the same way.