A380 Airbus Crosswind Landing Flight Test
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (506)
-
The 747 wasn't a big step at all in 1968. Not the technology. It was a calculated, but bold risk. Huge airliners had been attempted before, and some thought Boeing were foolish to build such a huge plane in the 1960's. This was at a time when air travel still was for a selected few, and relatively few people ever visited other countries (and if they did not so by plane).
For the uncertain and risky market of the early 2000's the A380 was a far bolder gamble. Paid off...
-
In 2150 people will say just the same about us.
People back in the late 1800's thought technology couldn't improve much more to what they had. This shallow view has been held throughout the cause of the history.
2012 technology will look as simple and primitive to the public in 2112 as 1912 technology looks to us. Or 1812 technology looked to the people of 1912 (a huge difference).
-
Just 150 years ago we used horse and cart, or the occasional steam train...now look, amazing.
-
Sieht aus wie Moby Dick! Aber super Pilots!
-
Damn how it drifts! :D
-
take off was more special
-
@fdeflam Its not really a big step. The 747 was a big step in 1968. Its just another big airplane that was financed by Euro governments. I work on airliners and frankly A 300 were corroding garbage. But they were older ones maybe they got better? Or maybe the sideways nose gear a320's are the same as a 737? I'm glad you love aviation but I love Boeing and i have to say some of my pals at LH love airbus. I should see my first 787 in a few months.
-
Молодец ! Мастерство заметно сразу! И вообще всех пилотов (российских) надо заставить летать на планерах и потом обязательно пилотах и не ниже мастера спорта!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
OMG!! Credit 2 them pilots that waz sum landing...
-
AMazing expertise of pilot :)
Anyone else here amazed at how humans can get that thing to fly??
LordOfTheTombs 3 months ago 37
@link2400 The fact that they DO bend and flex so much is precisely the reason that they DON'T snap off. If they were rigid... that's exactly what they WOULD do.
paulybarr 1 month ago 4