Captain Paul Watson Shot Defending Whales
Top Comments
All Comments (174)
-
@cantstoptheseeker PAUL WATSON WILL PAY FOR HIS SINS!!!
HIS RAPE AND MURDER WILL BE A DAY OF JOY FOR LOVERS OF FINED DINING.... AND JUSTICE!!!
-
@Arokov1 boo-hoo poor Japanese whaler who's breaking the law to make his living. If he was in any other country he'd be in jail where he belonged
-
@RTSstation The whalers should shoot these motherfuckers with the harpoon gun. That's what it's for, isn't it?
-
this is retarded.he was not shot.the kevlar stops the bullet but not the pressure.he would have been knocked back a bit but instead he goes "aww i got shot..afwawafwafwaf..waah"and the japanese were throwing warning FLASHBANGS.there was no proof that they had pointed guns at the crew.these japanese fishermen should have permission to shoot ans sink their boat.now people are gonna say"they are saving whales and dolphins!!"NOT THEY ARENT!they think they are but they are just being gay on TV
-
Steve Irwin is probably so pissed this gay boat is named after him
-
I was in Japan for a few days and met a crew member of a harpoon ship that Paul FatFuck Watson attacks and I asked him what he thinks of Paul and he said "He is taking food out of my childrens mouths I need this job to provide for them I am a single parent and its hard to put food on the table and Paul Watson is making it harder." So Fuck you Paul Watson, you are destroying lives.
-
@reznorected ur a dumb fucking cunt. he admitted to faking this whole scene. soo before you come on here calling everyone idiots get ur fucking facts straight u dumb faggot
-
@reznorected don't be a fucking idiot.
hes a liar and he lied! First of all the Japs were firing flash gernades which cannot kill you, and he faked the whole thing. and admitted it.
-
@reznorected the thing is he never got a bruise where he was shot at
-
fucking japs dont know hot to shoot, wish he died
fake
mike8reborn 2 years ago 14
No country regards ramming, disabling, or scuttling ships to be legal activities, and, except on rare occasions, even naval ships cannot lawfully interfere with foreign vessels on the high seas. When I described Watsons use of the charter to David Caron, the co-director of the Law of the Sea Institute, at the University of California at Berkeley, he said, Clearly wrong. There is no ambiguity.
drkuroneko1 2 years ago 7