Upload

This video is unavailable.

Avatar Review (Part 2 of 2)

RedLetterMedia RedLetterMedia·167 videos
128,194

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
908,832
Like     Dislike 300

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like RedLetterMedia's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike RedLetterMedia's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add RedLetterMedia's video to your playlist.

Published on Jan 30, 2010

Paaaaart Two of my Avatar review! I didn't hate this movie. I just didn't really like it a lot. I think James Cameron is a great filmmaker and I've liked a lot of his movies, but this one was just a little too simplistic plot wise. It worked with Titanic for some reason, but this one not so much? Good times though...

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Giantswm24

    i have to say i completely agree with plinkett. I didn't care much for avatar, the hype confused me quite a bit to say the least.

    · 16

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Giantswm24's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Giantswm24's comment.
  • mazdaplz

    it's remarkably one of the worst turds ever made.

    · 12

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mazdaplz's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mazdaplz's comment.
    in reply to Ballblam Burglerber (Show the comment)

All Comments (4,327)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • camethedawn

    ...then that would be the fault of an audience who doesn't know right from wrong;how the natives look is irrelevant,no one has the right to come to their home/world and plunder them.In the context of the film Na'vi are in the right,And you and others(Stoklasa included)just want to find excuses to overlook that.That's sad and wrong,IMO.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to camethedawn (Show the comment)
  • camethedawn

    Stoklasa's criticism of how Na'vi look are moot;The humans were not ugly so where is the unfairness.Additionally it's not a complaint that has a real effect on the structure of the film(like plot holes,lack of tension/threat or main character that doesn't change).Moreover,characters(es­pecially in a Cameron film) are supposed to be designed to connect with the audience so there's no real complaint there.but even so,if the last part of your post is to be believed...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to MAnnaconduit1 (Show the comment)
  • MAnnaconduit1

    yeah but the problem is that we live in a time where just because some movie is better then an even worse movie it can get a pass, well not really, was it better then those films yes, and was it okay for what it was yes, but the problems with it do take a way from it, but everyone seems to give it a pass, I think what he said at the beginning is right, if the navi were not designed to specifically attract and connect with us no one would care as much or at all, and I believe that is the worst.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MAnnaconduit1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MAnnaconduit1's comment.
    in reply to camethedawn (Show the comment)
  • MrXtreme961

    300 spartans disliked this video

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrXtreme961's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrXtreme961's comment.
  • hoppyman11

    I think it was more that the audiences where blown away by the 3-D effects, and James started a trend over here making every movie nowadays using the 3-D gimmick.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate hoppyman11's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate hoppyman11's comment.
    in reply to Giantswm24 (Show the comment)
  • camethedawn

    ...he pointed out those serious problems I've listed which he never mentions for Avatar.Mind you I don't say avatar is perfect,It has problems but none of the venom and hate from its detractors(Stoklasa included)is justified.For what it does do right it is certainly a better film than the haters give it credit for.It's not Citizen Kane.But it's not bad like Transformers ROTF.It's not Twelve Angry Men but it's not bad like Batman And Robin.SRSLY,It's at least better than that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to camethedawn (Show the comment)
  • camethedawn

    ...those structural problems(or lack thereof)that more seriously effect its ability to tell a coherent story of the type it is trying to tell.None of that is in Stoklasa's review and,IMO,shows a failure due to bias.Stoklasa is angry because Avatar hits too close to home(you can hear that in the video).He wanted the humans to win,Cannot accept the Na'vi or their world in the context of the movie and he pretends it's the film's fault.When he reviewed Phantom Menace...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to camethedawn (Show the comment)
  • camethedawn

    But his review should be about plot holes; that's the kind of issue that more seriously effect the film.It's issues like that that make up serious complaints with film.Really,I like Avatar and even I found many major plot holes in the story.Stoklasa is wrapped up in minor details that offend his world-view and can't look past that to judge the film on it's merits.I won't call The Godfather a bad film simply because I hate it's message/character portrayals.The film has to be judged on ...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to kenneth mcgriff (Show the comment)
  • kenneth mcgriff

    Stoklasa never bothers to mention plot holes thats not what this review is about

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kenneth mcgriff's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kenneth mcgriff's comment.
    in reply to camethedawn (Show the comment)
  • camethedawn

    No,but I'm not going to post the complete list of similarities/differences between Avatar and Star Wars(1977).I'll just say the two films are practically cut from the same cloth.Avatar hits closer to home and is a more down to earth version of Star Wars(1977).I say it's better made because despite his borrowing(which Lucas does too no less)Cameron is just better at telling a more coherent story than Lucas.The prequels show this;Lucas' continual tampering with the originals show this.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate camethedawn's comment.
    in reply to kenneth mcgriff (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later