Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Truthslayer's PPV Review Of TNA's No Surrender

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,613
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 20, 2009

PPV Score: 6.25

The Beautiful People vs. Sarita and Taylor Wilde: **

Eric Young vs. Hernandez: 1/4*

Samoa Joe vs. Daniels: *** 1/4

Suicide vs.
Pope D'Angelo Dinero: ** 3/4

Cody Deaner vs. ODB: ** 3/4

Kevin Nash vs. Abyss: *

Lethal Lockdown Match: *** 1/2

Bobby Lashley vs Rhino: * 1/2

Kurt Angle vs. Matt Morgan vs. Sting vs. AJ Styles vs. Hernandez: ** 3/4

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 20 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (446)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How low could you rate them?

  • A little of both. Wrestling has changed over the years.

  • bad review homie

  • Actually, buyrates can be found on tv (dot) com.

    For TNA's sake, I hope that they do push more young guys to the top. I'd like to see a TNA PPV main event between two younger guys.

  • If you've watched TNA and compared them from where they were last year to this year, they've been pushed far enough. There's a significant change of Eric Young of last year compared to this year.

    And the thing about the biggest star in TNA will all end up in opinions. To me the biggest star of TNA was Kurt Angle. The biggest attraction is Sting imo. There maybe no right or wrong for this.

    As for buyrates, no one knows TNA's buyrates for sure unless they work for TNA.

  • Nope, they haven't pushed them far enough, and what happened to Samoa Joe? The buyrates during his world title reign were higher, yet they've put him back in the midcard. Styles went over four years without being champion. TNA could be doing a much better job. BTW, I'm not the only one making that argument. It's all over the smark sites and the chat rooms. "Biggest attraction" is a distinction without a difference. The fact that he main events BFG every year makes him the top star.

  • Sting is the most watched champion according to facts! And no1 carried no one. Sting and Angle had a match that resulted in them brawling all over the arena.

    And please stop with the pushing young guys talk. If u've watched TNA for the past month or 2, Hernandez, Matt Morgan, AJ Styles, Dinero, Eric Young, & British Invasion have all been elevated. U can't elevate 10 guys @ 1nce with only 2hrs of tv.

    And no, Sting is not the top star in TNA. He's the biggest attraction. Big difference!

  • Usually, the main event segment of Impact gets crappy ratings. Furthermore, Sting main eventing four BFG's in a row would be kind of like Hulk Hogan main eventing four WM's in a row in the 21st century. It's not fair to the guys who are in the prime of their careers. TNA should be doing a better job of building up the younger talent.

  • Sting is the most watched champion according to what? I'm guessing that Angle carried Sting to a good match. Anyway, TNA needs to do something different because the ratings suck and have sucked for quite a while. I've always felt that they should give the younger guys a bigger push, including Samoa Joe. I don't know why he's not in the main event picture. It's not good if your top star is 50. They haven't gotten better than 1.3 with everything that they've done, and the smarks rip Impact apart.

  • Well for one Sting's match with Kurt Angle on Impact earned the highest quarter hour and the highest rating in TNA history bringing in 2.1 million viewers. Not to mention, Sting is also the most watched champion in TNA history, so there you go!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more