FJ cruiser vs jeep rubicon off roading jeep loses part 2
Uploader Comments (petefunc)
Top Comments
-
the cameraman laughs like a Hayena!
-
anybody else think it was odd that they say the jeep didnt make it but, theres a jeep at the top and they forgot to show the jeep "failing" to make it?
All Comments (13)
-
I doubt that's the fjs first try
-
@jcaled24 Try watching part 1 where you will see your requested jeep "failing". I am sure you will then say something like the Jeep driver was clueless or that the FJ had more momentum (which it didn't). The fact is the Jeep didn't perform as well. However, this means nothing. Have fun with what you brung
-
wow it just didnt show the jeep going up. i saw it already up there and im sure that wasn't the fjs first try
-
JEEPS SUCK!!!!
-
@inthetwisties Wow! And from an FJ'er!
And in turn the FJ sees better on-road handling. Toyota wants to build a product capable of venturing off-road nicely but can afford the IFS because they do not have an off-road following that Jeep does. Perhaps the easiest way to piss of Jeepers would be to change the Wrangler to IFS, so it'll never happen. It's about loyalty, tradition, and building an off-road specific vehicle, whereas Toyota is doing it in reverse. Unmodified they come close in the end
-
Its a jeep thing you wouldn't understand
-
quit bitching, they are both good offroad...the jeep (IMO) has more capabilities due to having a solid front axel, but the fj can still hang with an equally modded jeep on any trail...btw i have an fj lol
no shit dude, its a joke, ofcourse the rubicon is better offroad, but not that much considering how much better the fj is on road...i mean lets face it, what percentage do you think people spend on road verses off???
petefunc 3 years ago