FAA officially created animation for "Flight 77"

Which contradicts the impact damage, by a long shot.

The "Doomsday" plane flew over the Pentagon acting as the decoy. And the A-3 Skywarrior in AA Flight 77 paint scheme was the drone.

The perps had to "sell" a huge plane flying in close proximity to the Pentagon or onlookers would be suspicious a plane never flew close enough. "Selling" the crime.

The E4-B is a military plane and could fly over the Pentagon because it has a Mode 4 or 5 IFF transponder giving the "friendly" signal to disable the missile battery hidden in the Pentagon.

The "Doomsday" plane was the distraction (decoy,) and the A-3 was the drone.

z3. invisionfree. com/CIT/index. php?showtopic=356
North of Citgo witnesses.

A new investigation is needed. There is no doubt about it.

Craig, I know you think the missile theory is dubious, but is it possible that a missile could of been fired from a relatively short range along the south side at the same time the jet was passing over? It seems like some sort of missile/projectile would fake the impact damage better than just bombs planted inside...

You just aren't understanding me I guess.

A big 757 flies north of Citgo, a small faster plane streaks by along the light pole path. People who see the 757 see it for a few seconds, and don't immediatley look around to see if maybe a faster plane is flying at the Pentagon too...