FAA officially created animation for "Flight 77"

This was just released, 7 years and 1 day after the attack, September 12th 2008, the government admits the plane was on the north side of the citgo. Strangely, they show it hitting the building still, but of course this is irreconcilable with all physical damage and all other data. The fall out from this will be interesting to say the least.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• pentagon
• 9/11
• FAA
• norad
• pentacon
• north
• path

[lytetrip]

It's a real animation! That was really produced by the FAA. Go figure.

[lytetrip]

We say proceed with caution. There is too much evidence for an east of the river/DC flight path approach that this animation does NOT reflect.

[jizzmonger]

How did you get to be so Bonkers?

[Airportchris2]

Which contradicts the impact damage, by a long shot.

[OperationMockingbird]

The "Doomsday" plane flew over the Pentagon acting as the decoy. And the A-3 Skywarrior in AA Flight 77 paint scheme was the drone.

The perps had to "sell" a huge plane flying in close proximity to the Pentagon or onlookers would be suspicious a plane never flew close enough. "Selling" the crime.

The E4-B is a military plane and could fly over the Pentagon because it has a Mode 4 or 5 IFF transponder giving the "friendly" signal to disable the missile battery hidden in the Pentagon.

[OperationMockingbird]

The "Doomsday" plane was the distraction (decoy,) and the A-3 was the drone.

[OperationMockingbird]

A Maverick missile was deployed from an A-3 Skywarrior in American Airlines Flight 77 paint scheme in very close proximity to Wedge one of the Pentagon. Then the A-3 crashed into the freshly created hole.

[wakenbake22]

z3. invisionfree. com/CIT/index. php?showtopic=356

North of Citgo witnesses.

A new investigation is needed. There is no doubt about it.

[wakenbake22]

I think it is possible.

Most people would notice the large and loud 757 and miss the streaking missile, or even dismiss it as time goes on. Or are quiet about what they saw.

[wakenbake22]

I never said there were 2 planes "flying around" the Pentagon.

Several witnesses describe the plane as small and white, several more describe it as large and silver. Some think it was on the light pole path south of Citgo, most think it was north of Citgo. North of Citgo can't match the damage. Several say the plane was quiet, others heard it before they see it...

Is is possible there were 2 planes...I think so.

[wakenbake22]

You just aren't understanding me I guess.

A big 757 flies north of Citgo, a small faster plane streaks by along the light pole path. People who see the 757 see it for a few seconds, and don't immediatley look around to see if maybe a faster plane is flying at the Pentagon too...

[Bittermanscolon]

Are you nuts? a plane that flies by in a second or two....the other plane, what loiters in the air slowly somehow to draw all the attention? Somehow the silent ninja fast plane goes by and no one noticed? Yeah riiiight! Besides that, you have not a single shred of evidence to show that a second plane was flying around. That's a little insane.