Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

This Film is Not Yet Rated

Long Trailer for a new movie about the MPAA's rating system.  
 
Customize

More From: Kur0sh1r0

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
150 ratings
Sign in to rate
64,088 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (80)   Options

Loading...
allaboutdmagic (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This films had insightful interviews with John Waters, Matt Stone and others about what they had to go through to get their films passed. I also learned that there's a member of the Catholic clergy on the board of appeals! Seems kind of biased, doesn't it?
Watcher3223 (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Unfortunately, you can't really win in these cases.

The MPAA came about as a necessary compromise.

When the MPAA began as the MPPDA, its purpose was of self-governance with a production code that outlined exactly what you could and could not do, which was far more restrictive than the current system today.

For instance, under the Hays code, the story of your movie can't have the bad guys win, EVER.

Replacement of the code with the ratings system allowed more freedom, though it's not perfect.
Watcher3223 (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
And the reason why the MPAA was created: to stave off GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP, which would have happened as the Supreme Court in the early 20th Century didn't deem motion pictures as protected speech and, therefore, not covered under 1st Amendment protection. This was ruled because motion pictures were considered a business, not art.

But, regarding a member of the Catholic clergy being on the board of appeals, not surprising as the church had been involved with the MPAA since its early years.
toothfairytats (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Funny that their concern was censorship, yet what they do is censorship in its full form. The creepy thing is that independant film makers are for the most part raped when it comes to their ratings, yet if you are affiliated with a major company, they will give you notes on what you need to cut and what needs to change. For lack of a better phrase, the MPAA is completely fucked!
Watcher3223 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@toothfairytats

"Funny that their concern was censorship, yet what they do is censorship in its full form."

Less so than it was during the Hays period, at least. Films made during the time the Production Code was enforced were not rated. And, it would be the degree of censorship and who decided it; the film industry itself or the U.S. government.
Watcher3223 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@toothfairytats

Another concern is the fact that boardmembers of the MPAA may consist of people from major studios and the effort against independent productions may be due to Hollywood trying to quell outside competition.

Plus, the MPAA is also closely associated with NATO (National Association of Theater Owners).

This could have the workings of an anti-trust case if it can be proven with evidence.
greenjoker713 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It seems that Hollywood produced films are treated more leniently than independent films.
tttwas (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
upload the whole movie
verax17 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
What means aberrational behavior?
sadelanwar (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
aberrational
adj. abnormal, irregular, straying from the norm

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.