Theory Of Everything - The Poincaré Conjecture

If you would like to discuss any of my videos please join me on my new theory of everything (TOE) forums:

http://www.protheory.com (My Website)

http://www.fprotheory.com (My New Forum)


Please don't think me arrogant, I'm just a normal thinker that had an idea one day which turned into Positive Reacting Opposites (Pro Theory).

Please check out my channel and my website if you'd like to get a broader view of me and what I think. I'm a positive and friendly person but at the same time I've got to get some closure on this idea and this is my dilemma. I'm hoping that these videos will help me to explain.

I know it probably seems like a ridiculous idea at first glance, saying three things simultaneously, but when you look deeper into things you will see that it's not quite as ridiculous as it seems. My new forum is a mirror of my website open for complete discussion. YouTube comments and messages don't quite do as good a job as a proper discussion forum. I look forward to hearing from you :)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Poincaré
• Conjecture
• pro
• theory
• of
• everything
• toe
• millennium
• problems
• clay
• math
• institute

[kumodrome]

"Whether we like it or not" is irrelevant. Honestly, there is no logic in your "theory". It's absolute nonsense and has nothing to do with mathematics or physics or the precise statements that you are misinterpreting. If you "really, really, really think about something" you don't come up with circular arguments like "simultaneously being correct, incorrect and neutral". Instead you study mathematics and its rigid structure to prove things rigorously and filter nonsense like this....

[MTBMXrider]

"Every simply connected, closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere."

This is true (prove) or false (disprove), there is no inbetween. I'm sorry, but you're wrong. I suggest reading up on mathematical logic -being the "pedant" you are, you may find it enlightening.

[ander211000]

@Tomahawk1999 LOL!!!

[HubsNetwork]

3 dimensions require 3 answers ? you off ya tits ?

Poincare said a sphere is the most basic 3 dimensional shape there is.

Right wrong and something in the middle...looooool nice science...

[Tomahawk1999]

theory of youtube lol

[protheory]

@carlmelanson1 I expect to explain them as three potentials as referenced on my website. And as I just recently said I don't hold to unchanging constants. Again, if you would care to show me your own work on whatever subject then perhaps we could have a proper conversation about it. To be honest I've got a lot better things to do than post YouTube comments back and forth all night but I'll keep going until you get fed up of insulting me :)

[carlmelanson1]

@protheory How do you expect to explain the four fundemental forces without referring to the coupling constants? That's like trying to swim without getting wet. How do you expect to explain this without understanding the heirarchy problem? Have you ever even heard of it?

[protheory]

@carlmelanson1 I'm listening, my TOE is on Toequest, also my website protheoryDOTcom and my forum fprotheoryDOTcom, where is your website and your theory? If you look on my website you will see an essay by me on the four fundamental forces explaining my theory and what it says about each force in turn. I also don't hold to unchanging constants (1/137) so trying to study anything under such constraints would not be something I'd likely do as I'm about 3 not 1.

[carlmelanson1]

@protheory Listen, buddy. All I'm saying is that it's people like you who make hard fr real physicists to be taken seriously. This is a complicated and difficult subject. You claim to have a TOE. And yet, where is it. Your site just repeats the same jargon over and over. Where are the equations? Where are the theoretical implications? For instance, if you have a TOE, it should incorporate the four fundemental forces and explain why they have a heirarchy problem. Also, 1/137? Why this constant?

[protheory]

@carlmelanson1 So you're back to insults again I see, and swearing this time too. I see you're also using capitals to try and ORDER me to think like you I imagine. I don't see why I should stop saying something just because some words appear as a comment on a video of mine, I could criticize your work too perhaps if you would only show it here like I am showing my theory. Now if I simultaneously oppose, agree with and neutralize all criticism what do you say? You can't say that? I just did.