Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

James Lovelock - Population Reduction "max 1 billion"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
22,625
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 18, 2009

Top scientist James Lovelock discuses that the world population will be reduced and that this will happen in this century. And states, we would need a miracle to stop that happening!

His body language suggest to me that he knows something with certainty.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • MASSIVE respect to this guy....thumbs up!

  • @walter0bz well I suppose we are all at a loss and totaly hopeless. And plans for world depopulation will continue.

see all

All Comments (658)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Agenda 21

  • @TurboDally

    Brilliant comment.

  • Population reduction= HOLOCAUST!

    DERP DERP!

    Well duuuh, logically this means:

    Poverty reduction= HOLOCAUST OF THE POOR!

    People can be so stupid. It's extremely depressing seeing how stupid people can be :( We're on finite resources people, we're not asking for you to completely stop reproducing, but just don't overburden the planet with your 20 kids? :D

  • Notice how everyone who worked at JPL wants to murder billions of people? Coincidence? Jack Parsons, founder of JPL, was second to Aleister Crowley and head warlock in the USA. Sacrificing a few billion people would probably allow the gating and binding of some pretty spectacular demons. (No I am not a Christian, references to extradimensionals such as demons goes back to at least 5000 B.C. in Sanskrit documents)

  • This would explain why he is pro nuclear power. Thousands of Fukushimas will certainly reduce the Human population to less than 1 billion people, LOL.

  • A somewhat slow, thought out reduction in population, done by lower birth rates, not culling, would be fine. Consumption keeps increasing and so does the population. Something has to give. It's a fact. We either slow down now or die due to famine, war, drought ect.

  • @walter0bz AT LAST someone on Youtube who has a brain. I also agree with you. The time to fix the problem would have been in the 1980,s and as you say gradually reduce the population through old age. DRASTIC ACTIONS WILL take place. The system as it is now simply CAN NOT go on. The planet CAN NOT sustain a population of 7-8-9-10-11-12 Billion human's

  • @71shoelover - ok great :) with the situation i find all you can do is find peace understanding it instead of looking for peeps to blame. I possibly misinterpreted your wording.

    most people really don't get it....

    they think MMGW is something that can be fixed with recycling plastic bags, or a scam to raise taxes..

    .. when in fact peak oil makes it a moot point.

  • @walter0bz 100% agree with you sir. the planet SIMPLY CAN NOT sustain 7-8-9-10-11 Billion humans.

  • @71shoelover - the situation today is a dead end, no way out. the time to fix it would have been global 1cp in 1980's then we could have held pop peak at 4billion , gradually reduced it by dying of old age.. of course with reduced competition for land and resources life expectancy would rise so it would be a gradual process.

    for anyone that thinks renewable energy can save us, plants are already solar-powered nano tech assemblers that provide for our needs.we evolved around them

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more