Peter Schuller on Nietzsche and logos
Loading...
Loading...
1,872
Loading...
6:33
Jacques Derrida On 'Atheism' and 'Belief'by hiperf28964,550 views- 2:58
David Goldblatt - on resentment in Nietzscheby hermesnow1,867 views
- 2:17
Ricky Gervais - Politics (Hitler interprets Nietzsche)by travishealy1,901,606 views
- 3:24
Lech Witkowski on Logos and Mythosby hermesnow1,062 views
- 1:10
Grant Havers on Nietzscheby hermesnow708 views
- 0:33
The Logosby OntoLogos2,612 views
- 1:17
David Goldblatt - on importance of Nietzscheby hermesnow1,761 views
- 1:33
Wladyslaw Strozewski on transcendental logosby hermesnow714 views
- 10:12
Nietzsche: forte, fraco e além do homemby pgjr2331,452 views
- 8:53
1 - Nietzsche as Myth and Mythmaker 1of5by NohnSvaha1,373 views
- 5:45
Ethos, Pathos, Logosby kristadawnprice45,451 views
- 10:03
Nietzsche on Hardship 1 of 3by PhilosophicalMedia104,265 views
- 4:58
When Nietzsche Wept: Eternal Returnby mavaddat106,151 views
- 9:52
Allan Bloom on Nietzsche 1983 (1 of 5)by MarcusCMarcellus20,940 views
- 5:06
Villa-Lobos: Chorinhoby flapro43,977 views
- 2:23
Edward Halper on creativity in Nietzscheby hermesnow1,224 views
- 58:10
Conversations with History: Christopher Hitchensby UCtelevision202,971 views
- 9:49
Allan Bloom on Nietzsche 1983 (4 of 5)by MarcusCMarcellus3,936 views
- 5:02
Goatheads' Salute to Peter Schullerby matschu160 views
- 3:37
David Goldblatt on Nietzsche (part 3)by hermesnow1,522 views
If you want to go beyond Nietzsche, Aristotle did a long time before Nietzsche ever came on the scene. He thought the universe, including humans were rational and this lead to him believing things like, it rains so that plants can grow and other such non-sense.
Ironically, viewing the universe as chaotic (which, I believe modern physics is showing the universe is more and more, i.e. quarks) is the most natural view to take on the universe.
bahramf 1 year ago
I think he draws the correct inference, but the truth is too difficult to bear: thus logos. We need it, desperately.
comdico 2 years ago
I'm going to go ahead and call bullshit half way into this thing. There doesn't have to be reason in physics. There are many example in the universe that defy physics. Reason is still a human invention. It's like a secondary understanding of something. It's grappling with something in order to relate.
alejandro15187 3 years ago 2
Peter is a sophist, and a much less graceful one than what he accuses Nietzsche of being. "without reason, the world would collapse into absurdity" is hardly an argument. He certainly speaks of the 'fear of not knowing,' but this is simply another will. Human reason is an attempt to causally link consequence to desire; 'taking our place in the cosmos' is an analytic's attempt to sound cool, not a premise. The will to truth and fear is certainly more superficial than the will to power.
DJAR1E 3 years ago 2
Yes, Schuller is logocentric. Above, I said 'Schuller advocates logocentrism'. Do you not understand?
briannewion 4 years ago
Perspective on WHAT? Or do you claim there is no WHAT? And aren't you implicitly granting that the cosmos, from your (and others' perspectivalism) DOES collapse into perspectivalism?
amandaveritas 4 years ago
Or are you a dualist: 1) Reason 2) "Fight", reality, power? NOT EVERYONE IS. Many, many identify reason and generating. And are hylozoic monists.
amandaveritas 4 years ago
Schuller IS logocentric. Are you just calling him with a dirty name? And is the only kind of successful response a "fight"?
amandaveritas 4 years ago
There have been successful planned revolutions--and I do not mean coups d'etat. SO people have known how to do more than extrapolate within a regimen of items but to create a new--and better--one. That's a bit of extended articulation.
amandaveritas 4 years ago
"But the cosmos is an extended articulation",well,thats one perspective I suppose.:-)
spinozacelt 4 years ago