The AIDS Trap
Uploader Comments (HIVVideos)
All Comments (143)
-
@HIVVideos If it's not a rhetorical question 2008
-
@mykoolaidtastesfunny No, but there is a statue of limitations for scientific misconduct. That's why they let him go. It had to do with the falsification of a scientific paper which falls under an ethics statute.
-
@GreenEnergy1972 Surely there's no statute of limitations for crimes against humanity
-
@mykoolaidtastesfunny You are correct. It also had to do with time...The statue of limitations for prosecution was up, hence they could not prosecute him
-
@HispanicIsNotARace1 Lol....ok
Now...since Gallo had NOTHING to observe or examine...HOW did he come up with the "hiv" proteins used in/for ALL the "hiv" antibody tests snce the day he got the patent?
-
@HispanicIsNotARace1 You didn't "clearly" tell me why the charges were dropped. You wanted to pretend it didn't have to do with him falsfiying data. It didn't. I double checked Nbody disputes the scribbles are in Gallo's handwriting and that he lied. It had to do with a rule change.
-
@HispanicIsNotARace1 It isn't a false premise. It's a statement of fact. Don't forget WHY the chargess were dropped. You left out that Gallo was forced to share the patent money with Montagnier because....Gallo himself found NOTHING!
-
@HispanicIsNotARace1 The new standard meant that even though Gallo falsified his data and never actually found anything himself they decided proving he INTENDED to be a fraud instead of just incompetent was too hard. He had to leave the NIH though
It's a virus the same as your computer gets a "virus". Complain directly at the symptoms because they're greedy promiscuity hypocrites that are raping your energy. Their leader is bunga bunga Berlusconi. Intimate contact with another infected person is the parameter of the channel disease.
curesriches 5 months ago
@curesriches since when did being "infected" with non specific antibodies become an Orwellian concept to you?
HIVVideos 5 months ago