William Lane Craig describes EVOLUTION from a christian standpoint

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,592
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 6, 2011

William Lane Craig debates Christopher Hitchens - Does God Exist?
on EVOLUTION creation

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 85 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (314)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BattleshipAgincount You're fuckign retarded

  • @Damonferal

    Like what? Atheists are the ones making bold claims with pisspoor evidence like the clown I am. Reciting the bible to prove the bible is called reading the bible.... and that's why Craig is fair with his opponents!

    The guy doesn't need to prove that consciousness can exist without a physical body, so his entire argument is valid. A worthwhile argument should be COMPLIMENTED much like Craig does, with sound reasoning and logic and not devoid of it.

  • @Damonferal

    Like what? Atheists aren't the ones making bold claims with pisspoor evidence like the clown in the video. Reciting the bible to prove the bible is circular logic... and that's all that Craig has to throw at his opponents!

    The guy also failed to prove that consciousness can exist without a physical body, thereby leaving his entire argument without a foundation. A worthwhile argument should be COMPLIMENTED by evidence, not defy it.

  • @BattleshipAgincourt All you guys can do is throw insults. Plainly evident that you have nothing worthwhile to say against the arguments.

  • @droptozro 1) "There is a reason...." - That is your own reason, there is no any necessity to link the "yowm" in creation period to 'years' in 2 Peter & Rev. As I said, the measurable 'days', 'seasons' and 'years' only made possible in Genesis 1:14 after God made the planets in accurate courses.

    The 'morning' and 'evening' in Genesis can't be as what we on earth have now, where earth self-rotating aganist the sun, as only in Genesis 1:14 God set the courses on planets and galaxies.

  • @HellspawnICX

    Yeah. I had trouble buying it myself, but some people do actually take this clown very seriously.

    Craig really should have been a lawyer... at least then he could have put his talents to good use.

  • @yohanesmalaysia

    "Yowm" never have to be a definite length of time."

    You would be correct except for the fact that in the context---an evening and a morning denotes a normal 24 hour day.

    I'm sorry, logic speaks clearly in this--there is nothing to denote these ages are MOY. There is a reason God did it in 6 days(Exo 20:11, Lev 25) to represent the calendar He was going to set up to keep the ages of 1000 years(2 Peter 3:8). 6000 years under the curse, 1000 year reign(Rev 20). Read it.

  • @Libervurto

    "Seed" can be used as a mass noun.

    Go read Galatians 3-4... Paul explains it pretty well.

  • People are actually dumb enough to believe this dude? Must be a joke, no way people are THAT stupid.

  • @girtkaz Natural selection does not require change, it simply allows the most fit organisms to survive. If they have not changed, that means there was no need for them to do so. The ants, sharks, and alligators have not changed in millions of years because there is no need for them to do so. Mutations are random, the survivors aren't.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more