Exposing the "global warning" Hoax part 1/3

This video is meant as a video reply / commentary to the cassiopeiaproject´s video "Global warming" as to expose it as the Hoax it is.

Their video is, misleading, utterly deceiving, deceptive and contains randomly picked data with a further topping of data misinterpretation.

They have done their best as to bastardize scientific facts, so as to confuse us all as to what choices we as homo sapiens sapiens, has to make if we care for the future of our children and the survival of our species.

Why they have done so, I can only guess, though it seems as usua,l that there are "hell bent" religious people behind it.
In short

Their reasoning is so flawed, that I have come to think of the cassiopeiaproject, as the Kent Hovinds of global climate change.

The original video can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVASFcMwTXk


I did not need to make the following list of references & links, as the cassiopeiaproject did not cite any 3rd party material used in their video.
Not even their use of NASA animations, which is a large part of their video.

Further more, the fact that I am willing to share my sources and the cassiopeiaproject are not, should stand as a firm warning as to the validity of their claims.


Links and references:

Composite total Solar Irradiance (Frohlich & Lean)
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/rind_03/fig1.jpg

NASA (Updated all the friggin time)
DATASETS & IMAGES
GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Graphs of:
1) Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change
2) Annual Mean Temperature Change for Land and Ocean
3)ect. :)
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

National Snow and Ice Data Center (January 7, 2009)
2008 Year-in-Review
Graph´ of arctic ice extent
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

NASA (March 02, 2006)
NASA Mission Detects significant Antarctic Ice Mass Loss
Graph´ of Antarctic ice extent
This makes the claims in cassiopeiaproject´video = VOID & NULL
The graph is to the right, you cannot miss it :)
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2006-028

NASA´ global Climate change main site:
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/

NASA News (01.21.09)
Satellites Confirm Half-Century of West Antarctic Warming
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/warming_antarctica.html

NASA Feature (03.08.06)
Impact of Climate Warming on Polar Ice Sheets Confirmed
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/ice_sheets.html

NASA news (March 8, 2006)
NASA Survey Confirms Climate Warming Impact on Polar Ice Sheets
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/mar/HQ_06089_polar_ice_sheets_melting.html



For the skeptics

NASA
March 20, 2003
(I am afraid this is old news, the data has been compiled. The sun has only a minor effect on earth´ global warming. Anyway it´s a little fish you can play with. It´s just like a wrongly dated fossil for the creationists LOL)
SOLAR TREND THAT CAN CHANGE CLIMATE
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20030320/

Obsolete data used in the cassiopeiaproject´ video
Global Sea Ice Changes
The data is from November 1978 December 1998
The data is irrelevant because it only shows the area of ice [Km2] not the actual amount of ice which is measured in [KM3]. I am truly sorry for this little fact, the truth sometimes not as one wish it to be :)
Impact of Climate Warming on Polar Ice Sheets Confirmed
http://polynya.gsfc.nasa.gov/seaice_projects_image_10.html


Please email me if you find faults with any of the links or references.


Out out you deamons of ignorance :)


Yours truly
JRBendixen

Category:

Education

Tags:

• cassiopeiaproject
• Hoax
• Global
• Warming
• Al
• gore
• JRBendixen
• Climate
• change
• CO2
• Temperature
• Weather
• Ice
• NASA
• Information
• Data
• Lies
• Deceive
• Kent
• Hovind
• Atlantic
• ocean
• US
• USA
• Charts
• graphs
• Surface
• Greenhouse
• gas
• Environment
• False
• Misleading
• presumptuous
• presumptions
• Nonscience
• science
• America
• Americans
• Patriot

[feelzthelove]

Double standards abound in the world of environMENTALism. They pollute more than the average person. Al Gore still uses a Jet. O B A M A uses Air force 1. Nancy Pelosi and other democrats use jets too. All these jets put out thousands of tons of CO2 yet its okay for them cause they know better. We the sheep will pay for their standards of living cause we the sheep won't have a standard more than poor.

[JRBendixen]

@feelzthelove Quote:"Double standards" That is a very odd way to see it. I mean, it seems to me that, you are unable to comprehend the simplest of notions and in this case it is a question of priority.

For example,it has to be clear that my personal vacation flights are far less important for society than the travels of diplomats and politicians.

This is also how our societies work now and have been for all history, with good reason by the way.

[JRBendixen]

@JRBendixen It seems to me you are trying to argue that environMENTALists, mean NATO should go to war on bicycles. You can probably find some people whom think like that, but the fact remains 95% of people concerned with the environment are not so daft.

[MaximumKahnage]

wtf double post doesn't matter I just wanted to say I wonder if the sun will rice tomorrow too

[MaximumKahnage]

a common herd of buffalo or bovine increase in numbers by 30% every year yet they say the chemicals released by our livestock are damaging the planet?? If we didn't kill them there would be millions more like in the past yet global warming didn't exist then or did it?I believe in global warming however we are not the cause that's why the polar ice caps on Jupiter's and Saturn's moons are melting how could we cause that? we cant it's a natural occurrence and has been recorded in the past. SCAM!!

[MaximumKahnage]

a common herd of buffalo or bovine increase in numbers by 30% every year yet they say the chemicals released by our livestock are damaging the planet?? If we didn't kill them there would be millions more like in the past yet global warming didn't exist then or did it?I believe in global warming however we are not the cause thats why the polar ice caps on jupiters and saturns moons are melting how could we cause that? we cant it's a natural occurrence and has been recorded in the past. SCAM!!

[Shepherd1OFH]

If local temperatures behave the same way across multiple sample areas in different parts of the world, then it IS an accurate measure of global temperature change. Let's see if they do or do they behave differently.

[co2isgoodal]

It's amazing to me that people STILL believe in the global warming scam, but to actively support it! Despite what science says?!?!?!

Then the tired old discredit and insult Saul Alinsky tactics *yawn*

Climate Realists are termed "ignorant" because we know that CO2 follows warming. We are said to be crazy because we know that if you shut down 4500 of 6000 temp gathering stations, the data will favor the AGW scammers.

We are asked to ignore the hundreds of exposed Climatgegate emails.

AGW is dead

[ttowntom]

But fertilizers aren't the largest reason for increased output. It's high-yield strains. Modern fertilizers can increase output by more than 3X. But high yield strains have increased grain returns by more than 25X. And we're developing higher-yield strains faster and faster as genetic science improves.

In 100 years, new strains alone are expected to increase food production by 15-25%. Extending modern agriculture to the Third World will mean more than a 100% increase.

[ttowntom]

@JR,

Are you intentionally being obtuse? Your statement that "50% of crops use inorganic fertilizer" doesn't contradict my statement at all. In fact, it _supports_ it. If we do nothing but simply extend modern fertilizers to the other half of the world, we will more than double agricultural output.

(cont)