Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The way to Happiness: Respect the Religious Beliefs of others.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,204
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 9, 2011

Tolerance is a good cornerstone on which to build human relationships. When one views the slaughter and suffering caused by religious intolerance down all the history of Man and into modern times, one can see that intolerance is a very non-survival activity.

Religious tolerance does not mean one cannot express his own beliefs. It does mean that seeking to undermine or attack the religious faith and beliefs of another has always been a short road to trouble.

Philosophers since the times of ancient Greece have disputed with one another about the nature of God, Man and the universe. The opinions of authorities ebb and flow: just now the philosophies of "mechanism"1 and "materialism"2—dating as far back as Ancient Egypt and Greece—are the fad: they seek to assert that all is matter and overlook that, neat as their explanations of evolution may be, they still do not rule out additional factors that might be at work, that might be merely using such things as evolution. They are today the "official" philosophies and are even taught in schools. They have their own zealots who attack the beliefs and religions of others: the result can be intolerance and contention.

If all the brightest minds since the fifth century B.C. or before have never been able to agree on the subject of religion or anti-religion, it is an arena of combat between people that one would do well to stay out of.

In this sea of contention, one bright principle has emerged: the right to believe as one chooses.

"Faith" and "belief" do not necessarily surrender to logic: they cannot even be declared to be illogical. They can be things quite apart.

Any advice one might give another on this subject is safest when it simply asserts the right to believe as one chooses. One is at liberty to hold up his own beliefs for acceptance. One is at risk when he seeks to assault the beliefs of others, much more so when he attacks and seeks to harm them because of their religious convictions.

Man, since the dawn of the species, has taken great consolation and joy in his religions. Even the "mechanist" and "materialist" of today sound much like the priests of old as they spread their dogma.

Men without faith are a pretty sorry lot. They can even be given something to have faith in. But when they have religious beliefs, respect them.

The way to happiness can
become contentious when one
fails to respect the religious
beliefs of others.

1. mechanism: the view that all life is only matter in motion and can be totally explained by physical laws. Advanced by Leucippus and Democritus (460 B.C. to 370 B.C.) who may have gotten it from Egyptian mythology. Upholders of this philosophy felt they had to neglect religion because they could not reduce it to mathematics. They were attacked by religious interests and in their turn attacked religions. Robert Boyle (1627--1691), who developed Boyle's Law in physics, refuted it by raising the question as to whether or not nature might have designs such as matter in motion.

2. materialism: any one of a family of metaphysical theories which view the universe as consisting of hard objects such as stones, big or very small. The theories seek to explain away such things as minds by saying they can be reduced to physical things or their motions. Materialism is a very ancient idea. There are other ideas.

Reference:
http://www.thewaytohappiness.org/thewaytohappiness/precepts/respect-the-relig...

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now wait a minute.

    In this very series "the way to happiness" is called a "non-religious moral code".

    So how can they claim that "freedom of religion" should shield them from rational criticism of their dogma and practices?

    Scientology always applies a double standard. They criticize others' beliefs, but would love to prohibit others from criticizing theirs.

  • WTF? Is this how you preach tolerance? "Man without faith, are a pretty sorry lot." !? Isn't this disrespectful of my lack of belief? How would you feel if i said "Man with belief, are a pretty sorry lot"?

    You better get your facts straight. %86 of the earths population are religious people. I seriously doubt that an atheist/non-practitioner would behave in such a way you have shown in the video since it is us who are disrespected in every single turn.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more