Questions for Young Earth Creationists

I'm responding to this gentleman that Epy interviewed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_lXHglaH-Q&feature=channel_video_title

More things tomorrow.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• epydemic2020
• creationism
• YEC
• young earth creationism
• Intelligent Design
• evolution
• speciation
• andromeda galaxy
• google
• phone
• android
• droid
• google sky map
• genesis
• bible
• literalism
• creation
• Darwin
• theory of evolution
• god
• jesus

[JungleJargon]

@Vynjira You failed to show me a mechanism that does not have a maker. (so the affirmation that all mechanisms have a maker stands)

You failed to account for over 100 million cubic miles of consecutive layers of micro sedimentation ( so you have no argument to make)

[JungleJargon]

@Vynjira You failed to address the recent finds of people in Israel reportedly much older than the African finds.

Japeth's wife was somehow related to the Neanderthal race.

They were all humans btw, no relations of ours are in any way connected to any ape families with ape jaws, heads, necks, shoulders, wrists, hips, knees and feet etc.

[Vynjira]

@JungleJargon Cognitive distortion, wiki.

- All-or-nothing thinking (Your entire argument)

- Overgeneralization (Specifically Mechanisms)

- Jumping to conclusions (Specifically Flood Sediments)

- Disqualifying the positive (Specifically Evolution)

- Magnification and minimization (Your entire argument)

- Should statements (Specifically Mechanisms)

- Labeling and mislabeling (Specifically Mechanisms)

The use of "Specifically" is not meant to exclude the rest of your arguments.

[Vynjira]

@JungleJargon No, Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosomal Adam(Cro-Magnon Man or Homo Sapiens Sapiens) both originated in Africa. They did not evolve from Neanderthals, they evolved from Homo sapiens idaltu, which evolved from Homo rhodesiensis, both of which also originated in Africa.

When Cro-Magnon Man left Africa they encountered Neanderthals and it is believed they interbred because 1-4% of European and Asian DNA is from Neanderthals.

Explaining their differences from Africans.

[JungleJargon]

@Vynjira That "out of Africa" idea has been largely disproved with the findings of much older humans outside of Africa and the discovery of Neanderthal DNA in Europeans and Asians. This supports the existence of Noah because both Europeans and Asians are descended from Noah's son Japeth, so Neanderthal -mitochondrial- DNA came from Japeth's wife. It was a big surpise for scientists and they likely still haven't figured out the connection. LOL!

Mechanisms *always* have a maker.

[Vynjira]

@JungleJargon Our DNA can be traced ~200,000 years ago to a woman, ~70,000 years ago a man. Which means "Eve" came first and was having inter-species sexual encounters. Both of which would have been African and had parents with similar DNA. With the exception of a few hundred mutations that we all have.

Noah is a fictional character.

Nonsense about Mechanisms = Refuted Intelligent Design Argument

None of your arguments actually address what scientists actually claim, dumb-ass.

[JungleJargon]

@Vynjira DNA requires there be an Adam and an Eve.

We all came from the albino Noah and three women of the sons of Noah.

Mechanisms that always have a maker do not contradict scientific facts.

Mechanisms always have a maker equal to or greater than the mechanisms, ...in the real world.

I do refute strawman arguments all day. It shows how weak the strawman arguments against having a Maker are.

Working mechanisms always do have a maker and biology is not exempt from rules of science.

[Vynjira]

@JungleJargon Human DNA contradicts the existence of Adam and Eve.

Your assertions contradict the scientific facts. Until you have something published in a peer reviewed Scientific Journal, that actually supports what you're arguing and contradicts what the scientists are saying, you're wrong.

Trying to repackage intelligent design won't get you anywhere. You can try to refute straw man arguments all day, it only shows how weak your argument is that you need to blatantly lie.

[JungleJargon]

@Vynjira It is not about design, it is about function, working parts and mechanisms inside of you that require a Maker equal to or greater than the working mechanisms.

I am the only one talking about function, working parts and mechanisms in life forms requiring a Maker, in case you failed to notice.

You failed to prove that any mechanism does not have a maker.

I can say that believers in objects making or refining life forms are irrational and illogical.

...and I would be correct.