SA Radio - Taki's Magazine Editor Richard Spencer Discusses Neoconservatism
Top Comments
All Comments (35)
-
This interview was posted in 2008 and Southern Avenger and Richard Spencer are actually predicting that if Obama goes to war, the conservatives will criticize him for starting a war which doesn't serve the country's interest.
Here we are in 2011 and both men have been proven absolutely correct.
-
The republican party needs to lose the neo-conservatism and get back to it's working class roots.
-
Let radical Muznutters get ahold of a few nuclear weapons, especially in the Middle East, shutdown the Persian Gulf, and then see what impact it has on the USA.
I agree that the Dearborns, etc, in and of themselves are not threatening. What they will breed in two generations is very scary.
I must question your understanding of the influence of radical I slam on the Saudis. They have blackmailed them for a generation and use KSA as their bankroll. You are correct about Hamas.
-
I did not say Islamic extremists cannot threaten people, I said they pose no threat to the continued existence of the USA. That is different . . . and true.
Dearborn is not scary because there are muslims there. I am not pro-multiculturalism but I am not scared of muslims. Calm down.
Yes, they have been around for a while as a FRINGE movement. But with all the proposed and realised regime changin' by the West, Saudi is untouched. Hamas was nothing before Israel built it up to counter PLO.
-
Virtually no threat? Exactly where were you on 9/11/01? Two people I knew personally are now molecules thanks to radical Islam. Take a ride to Dearborn, MI, Patterson, NJ, or Atlanitic Avenue in Brooklyn and then tell me how there is "virtually no threat."
These savages appeared LONG before Ba'athism came into fashion. Google Wahhabi/Wahhabism (and its spelling varieties) and you will see that this movement has been growing for a century or more.
-
i loved your response. and you're right, the third parties really do need to radicalize and stop being pussies that allow themselves to be shoved off to the side.
i wonder if Barr "seems to have a very small budget" compared to the mainstream parties because they're owned by big business, and therefore controlled by them under this corporate fascism that we know live under.
america has become everything it once stodd against, it's fucking pathetic. and people STILL support reps and dems.
-
He won't make it (seems to have a very small budget) and if he did they would probably change the rules to exclude him or find some technicality or a major candidate would make an excuse to drop out. The system is stacked against small parties for a reason, you know.
It is time for small parties to radicalise and stop playing the big parties' games, proclaiming that America is NOT democratic (nor properly republican)!
-
They are dangerous . . . mainly to their own countries (that is why they are often fiercely oppressed and tortured by dictators). They pose a minor threat to certain European countries and virtually no threat to the continued existence of the USA.
They also appeared on the world scene due to Western government support which used them against Arab Ba'athist-style nationalism.
-
I am no lover of the Bush Administration, but I sure wish the Libertarians would recognize the dangers of radical Muzmuppets
-
*dances and cries all at the same time*
All the sound and the fury and it represents nothing.
THANK GOD! THANK YOU S.A. for getting this out.
Neocons, piss on their graves.
Neocons do NOT represent the Average American.
They're a small group of Zionists.
Not that Zionism is God awful but this strain running America isn't looking out for Americans!
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 14
John MCain...just another filthy neo-Con.
I'll be voting for Bob Barr of the Libertarian Party!
Kras3169 3 years ago 9