JOHN DEERE 1270D TIMBER HARVESTER

HARVESTER ,FELLING AT GLENTROOL, GALLOWAY FOREST PARK, OPERATED BY BRIAN MCQUAT ,(BOON).

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• JOHN
• DEERE
• TREE
• HARVESTER
• GLENTROOL
• SCOTLAND
• valmet
• ponsse
• rottne
• timberjack

[Jeff99GS]

I love how these green peace faggs talk trash about logging....YET they write their checks and wipe their asses with paper?!?!?!

[idontcare80]

@rschiwal Yeah, then what happens once most of the trees are gone? Everything is that was producing carbon is STILL producing carbon and there isn't much left to absorb it! Didn't finish your thought there did ya, moron?

[casepotter]

FUCK TREES

[mohastie]

@ewsify Your comments may be relevant in the USA, But here in the UK, we don`t just leave the clear-felled ground alone and hope it regenerates itself. It is a legal requirement to restock the old forests with trees at 2800 stems per hectare. These forests in the UK are not natural forests like you have in the US, they were all planted in the late 1940`s onwards, after the second world war, as commercial crops. If it was not for commercial forests, there would be very few woodlands in the UK

[ewsify]

@mohastie my point being, if you want to actually responsibly forest, you'll do it the right way with selective harvest and low-impact practices, rather than romping around on a diesel-powered land-and-tree-fucker like this machine right here.

[ewsify]

@mohastie Old growth forests actually absorb more carbon than new forests. There's an initial increase in carbon sequestration per unit weight with a young tree, that levels off after a couple decades - thats true - but the carbon absorption of a fully-matured, old-growth tree is much higher overall. Also not just trees, but leaf litter, hummus, organisms in intact soil, mosses, ferns absorb carbon in a mature forest. Old growth forests absorb more carbon than a regenerating clearcut.

[idontcare80]

@Lexicologist71 Duh, I meant carbon dioxide. No one is trying to outlaw carbon, but many people and organizations are trying to reduce the dependence our society has on fossil fuels, which is something that is going to have to be done soon, global warming or not.

[Lexicologist71]

@idontcare80 Uh, moron, YOU are made with carbon. Every single living thing on earth contains Carbon. Proteins, fats, and carbohydrates are made with carbon. Did you ever stop to think why 'carbohydrate' is named that? It has to do with its chemical composition. We don't produce carbon. It is a building block of what we are. If not for carbon, idiots like you wouldn't be able to outlaw carbon.

[raclop]

:'{ 

[BarelyBen]

Im in the logging industry and I can tell you in 10 years there will be thousands of small trees growing in place of these trees all naturally wood is the words only re new able resource

[TheMONTREYJACK1993]

ffs im sick an tired of listining to stupid green peace hipy cunts rant on about trees being felled ITS SUSTAINABLE IN THE UK YOU DICK WODS!!!!!!!! they plant they thin they clear and then plant more trees than their were before sorted u wna rant fuck off to brazil where they log vital trees theres the problem

[jcobaltss2005]

@rschiwal you are essentially right. they have a thing going on called carbon credits and you get more credits for preventing methane from going into the atmosphere than c02 because methane as a greenhouse gas is about 21 times worse than c02. So essentialy since these guys are preventing these trees from being burnt or rotting and releasing greenhouse gases, they are improving our atmosphere. thats if this will be used for lumber not biomass