@suboptimal I would assume that when you state that homosexuals are trying to hijack Christianity, you mean that homosexuals are interpreting the Bible and setting an example for other Christians, which is exactly what the heterosexuals of Christianity are doing. Thus, this is indirectly implying that homosexuals have less right to interpret the Bible and set an example, which is completely unjust.
@suboptimal Second, in my previous comment, I made no reference to sexual orientation. In fact, I wasn't even talking about anyone twisting religion around. I was talking about Christianity twisting FACTS and information around to pullinate into the religious population and maintain their religious figurehead, even if the statements and information they put out is biased, ignorant, and/or untrue
@suboptimal I never stated in any of my comments in our debate that homosexuals could reproduce by having sex with the same gender. I states that in a scientific study shown by a peer-reviewed scientific journal named NewScientist that some homosexuals are known to engage in sexual acts with other women in order to pro-create children of the their own. Again, I never suggested that homosexuals could have sex with the same gender and successfully reproduce.
@GentlemanThunder7 Give me a freaking break. You're the one who is misleading people trying to claim "scientific" studies that say two guys can create offspring and other nonsense.
It is also gays who are twisting religion around. Straight people are the majority of Christians and they have the right to interpret the bible and set standards for other Christians. It's gays who are trying to hijack Christianity to redefine it to suit their own agenda.
@spartacandream That's basically the main method of function for modern Christian institutions: twisting of the facts and implications of Heaven and Hell in order to manipulate the world's population to place a religious figurehead on the planet.
Actually, heterosexuality is the broad term, as it means opposite-sexuality, as homosexuality means mansexuality. It just means you like men, and you are a man, though of course its also used to mean a woman who likes a woman. These people irritate me to no end when they mislead people to harm them.
@suboptimal For the sake of the argument, let's say that homosexuals are, hypothetically, an evolutionary dead-end. Even if that is so, the amount of homosexuals in the world, more specifically, the United States, is so low, that it wouldn't even matter. In addition, the same scientific studies show that homosexuality actually spawned from evolutionary methods, thus showing that homosexuality was actually a part of "nature's intention."
@suboptimal I wouldn't exactly agree with that because there's no valid form of statistics that show that. Also, we're arguing about homosexuality, not the legitimacy of anal sex, because you think it's sexually deviant for heterosexuals as well as homosexuals...just more so for homosexuals, which makes no sense. As for the studies, you can laugh at it all you want, but it's more abundant and credible evidence than you've had throughout this entire argument.
@GentlemanThunder7 I'm sure you'd agree that LEAST 95% of homosexuals have anal sex. So you might as well be saying "I am not shifting this argument towards rain" when talking about a storm. You make no sense, bro. As I've explained many times, gays are deviant because of what they do to rectums.
P.S. There is no such thing as butt babies. No matter how hared you pound a butthole; you're not going to make a baby. I'm LMFAO at your so called scientific study.
Christianity is a superstitious experiment that has failed utterly. It is time to abandon Christianity.
jones6119 4 months ago
@suboptimal I would assume that when you state that homosexuals are trying to hijack Christianity, you mean that homosexuals are interpreting the Bible and setting an example for other Christians, which is exactly what the heterosexuals of Christianity are doing. Thus, this is indirectly implying that homosexuals have less right to interpret the Bible and set an example, which is completely unjust.
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
@suboptimal Second, in my previous comment, I made no reference to sexual orientation. In fact, I wasn't even talking about anyone twisting religion around. I was talking about Christianity twisting FACTS and information around to pullinate into the religious population and maintain their religious figurehead, even if the statements and information they put out is biased, ignorant, and/or untrue
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
@suboptimal I never stated in any of my comments in our debate that homosexuals could reproduce by having sex with the same gender. I states that in a scientific study shown by a peer-reviewed scientific journal named NewScientist that some homosexuals are known to engage in sexual acts with other women in order to pro-create children of the their own. Again, I never suggested that homosexuals could have sex with the same gender and successfully reproduce.
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
@GentlemanThunder7 Give me a freaking break. You're the one who is misleading people trying to claim "scientific" studies that say two guys can create offspring and other nonsense.
It is also gays who are twisting religion around. Straight people are the majority of Christians and they have the right to interpret the bible and set standards for other Christians. It's gays who are trying to hijack Christianity to redefine it to suit their own agenda.
suboptimal 1 year ago
@spartacandream That's basically the main method of function for modern Christian institutions: twisting of the facts and implications of Heaven and Hell in order to manipulate the world's population to place a religious figurehead on the planet.
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
Actually, heterosexuality is the broad term, as it means opposite-sexuality, as homosexuality means mansexuality. It just means you like men, and you are a man, though of course its also used to mean a woman who likes a woman. These people irritate me to no end when they mislead people to harm them.
spartacandream 1 year ago
@suboptimal For the sake of the argument, let's say that homosexuals are, hypothetically, an evolutionary dead-end. Even if that is so, the amount of homosexuals in the world, more specifically, the United States, is so low, that it wouldn't even matter. In addition, the same scientific studies show that homosexuality actually spawned from evolutionary methods, thus showing that homosexuality was actually a part of "nature's intention."
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
@suboptimal I wouldn't exactly agree with that because there's no valid form of statistics that show that. Also, we're arguing about homosexuality, not the legitimacy of anal sex, because you think it's sexually deviant for heterosexuals as well as homosexuals...just more so for homosexuals, which makes no sense. As for the studies, you can laugh at it all you want, but it's more abundant and credible evidence than you've had throughout this entire argument.
GentlemanThunder7 1 year ago
@GentlemanThunder7 I'm sure you'd agree that LEAST 95% of homosexuals have anal sex. So you might as well be saying "I am not shifting this argument towards rain" when talking about a storm. You make no sense, bro. As I've explained many times, gays are deviant because of what they do to rectums.
P.S. There is no such thing as butt babies. No matter how hared you pound a butthole; you're not going to make a baby. I'm LMFAO at your so called scientific study.
suboptimal 1 year ago