Ron Paul on Abortion - South Carolina Debate 1-19-2012

CNN tries to Skip Ron Paul after the other 3 had Time to give there answer - Three Crowd Demands Paul his Time!

Abortion is a violent act against another life and the State has the Authority to make the Laws against Violence in there Jurisdiction as the US Constitution States - Get the Federal Government out of it and let the States make the Laws.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ron
• Paul
• Abortion
• newt
• gingrich
• south
• carolina
• debate

[LxE100]

Like Ron Paul, I'm 100% pro-life, but I know that federal governments with too much power become Nazi Germany governments. Abortion is murder, but we should leave it up to the state to decide, just like we do murder. Ron Paul is correct, and I salute him!

[NoUniEst]

@ROGER459

This is the internet, asshole. All anybody has to do is look up ISRAEL UN RESOLUTIONS, or JIMMY CARTER ISRAEL to see for themselves. Stop trolling, you ZIONIST NUTJOB!

[coregoon]

The fact that this guy is the best choice in the election makes me fear for the liberties of all U.S. women.

Then again, there are others who are much worse. Nobody's perfect. I guess this is just his failing.

[Kinosis79]

@nicocap24 To bad most people here are to stupid to do the same.

[nicocap24]

If I was American I would totally vote for this guy

[dragsterf]

@grailstar13 I am a Ron Supporter and am pro-choice too, but i still love Ron Paul and wouldnt vote for anyone else because of everything else about him, he would have our economy booming so fast that this wouldnt even be an issue, just use birth control or something, if it were me, i would trade abortions for a peaceful world, a gold standard, troops coming home, freedom restored to the people, no more policemen of the world

[grailstar13]

Wiki; "Paul calls himself "strongly pro-life" and "an unshakable foe of abortion". In 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011, Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act, which would have life defined as beginning at conception at the Federal level"

He's a nut. Until the cord is cut a fetus is not an independent person, it's part of the mother's body, period. Does it have a social security number? Then it's not a person under the law, nor should it be. Besides, who says living as a human is good? It's crappy.

[Onihikage]

I lol'd when Santorum mentioned the Declaration [of Independence] protecting anything. IT'S NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT, YOU MORON!

[Proverbs1533]

I have to say as a historical protestant Christian that Ron Paul is the candidate that I support for the Presidency. The more I learn about the guy the more I like his views and he seems to be the most consistant of any of the candidates

[kodachromefilm]

@txripper1 My original point, which I wish not to deviate from, is that Ron Paul is pro-choice. He recognizes life at conception, thus must understand the constitution to include unborn life. Anyone, no matter what they do for the pro-life movement, believes in taking an unborn life, or believe that others (states) can take a unborn life, and kill it, not only believe in legal murder, but is pro-choice. There is no other way in looking at it. An unborn baby is a baby according to Ron Paul.

[kodachromefilm]

@txripper1 It is well known for those who studied the constitution and the times in which produced the constitution, that life was defined as life. No perameters needed in the definition. Nowhere does the constitution defines the beginning or the ending of life. All life was recognized. We cannot define or interpret the constitution as defining life begining at a certain point. We are to assume all life. That is a "personhood". The constitution addresses the issue under "life". (part one)