@NewAgeisSewAge How do you know the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus manuscripts are corrupt? Who corrupted them? Are you aware they aren't primary for the NIV work? Assuming all your accusations are true modern translations draw on source materials that precede their 1881 work of Westcott & Hort. Why do you care about the sexual habits of an NIV translator? The issues is #1 which manuscripts are most trustworthy and #2 how do we best express the original language in way people can understand.
@NewAgeisSewAge As your next post points out it's not an issue of taking anything out it's a question of which manuscripts you start with. You don't need "without cause" to understand Christ's plain meaning in Mt. 5:22 (the kind of anger that motivates murder is subject to judgment like murder). Isa 14:12 clearly isn't referring to Christ regardless of translation and you don't the KJV's version of 1 John 5:7 to believe in the Trinity. It's about manuscript authority, nothing else.
Well NIV starts with the Corrupt Manuscripts like the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. Moreover, the key people responsible for translating these mansucripts which formed the foundations of NIV and almost all new Bible versions - Wescott and Hort were members of the Ghostly Guild and they were not Christians though. This is proven from their own writings and sayings which was published by their sons. Further, there was even a Roman Catholic priest and another Lesbian in the NIV Committee..
Modern versions call Jesus Lucifer (Compare Isaiah 14:12 with Rev. 22:16). They call Jesus a liar when they remove just 3 words - "without a cause". There are numerous omissions like Matt. 17:21, Acts 8:37, and even the key verse that's central to the doctrine of Trinity that is I John 5:7. It's well known that majority of the Bible colleges are infiltrated & down with filth & so you don't hear any of these things ever addressed by their products..
People keep defending their betrayers. Many willingly celebrate these wildly wicked weird witchcraft holidays from the weathered old Roman religion of rapists. Are these holidays the beautiful side of evil?...Well, evil, is still evil no matter how it is served to you. The Lord God shall a put curse on all who celebrate these holidays of Hell. You and your children' s children shall suffer plague and death. The Holy Bible explains this fact.
@BLCFrenzy In addition to things like software modern scholars have an additional 400 years worth of scholarly work, manuscript discoveries and new linguistic data to draw from. Obviously any translator must be fluent in Greek and Hebrew, just as true today, but proving one group is more "gifted" or "brilliant" is tough, evidence please? If 1611 English developed from Middle English in what sense is it more "original" than modern English or do you dispute its Old/Middle English origins?
@FBCWillowsPastor - Who says that they have mroe resources? and who also says that Modern translators are anywhere near the translators of the King James Version? Thmen - again - were highly gifted and educated in ancient languages, several of them being fluent in the ancient tongues. My basis is history itself. And what I mean by original English is just that: original English. The Canterbury tales were written in Middle English - A distinctly different language than that of the KJV-AV.
I pushed the pause button and never came back, I don't own a blabel.
BitfeNicks 3 weeks ago
lol
SuperBspb 1 month ago
Hi: TKS: for the info!!!
Pastor David Skakun
cmccaable 5 months ago
@NewAgeisSewAge How do you know the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus manuscripts are corrupt? Who corrupted them? Are you aware they aren't primary for the NIV work? Assuming all your accusations are true modern translations draw on source materials that precede their 1881 work of Westcott & Hort. Why do you care about the sexual habits of an NIV translator? The issues is #1 which manuscripts are most trustworthy and #2 how do we best express the original language in way people can understand.
FBCWillowsPastor 9 months ago
@NewAgeisSewAge As your next post points out it's not an issue of taking anything out it's a question of which manuscripts you start with. You don't need "without cause" to understand Christ's plain meaning in Mt. 5:22 (the kind of anger that motivates murder is subject to judgment like murder). Isa 14:12 clearly isn't referring to Christ regardless of translation and you don't the KJV's version of 1 John 5:7 to believe in the Trinity. It's about manuscript authority, nothing else.
FBCWillowsPastor 9 months ago
Well NIV starts with the Corrupt Manuscripts like the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. Moreover, the key people responsible for translating these mansucripts which formed the foundations of NIV and almost all new Bible versions - Wescott and Hort were members of the Ghostly Guild and they were not Christians though. This is proven from their own writings and sayings which was published by their sons. Further, there was even a Roman Catholic priest and another Lesbian in the NIV Committee..
NewAgeisSewAge 9 months ago
@FBCWillowsPastor ABSOLUTELY NOT !..
Modern versions call Jesus Lucifer (Compare Isaiah 14:12 with Rev. 22:16). They call Jesus a liar when they remove just 3 words - "without a cause". There are numerous omissions like Matt. 17:21, Acts 8:37, and even the key verse that's central to the doctrine of Trinity that is I John 5:7. It's well known that majority of the Bible colleges are infiltrated & down with filth & so you don't hear any of these things ever addressed by their products..
NewAgeisSewAge 9 months ago
EASTER, CHRISTMAS & TRUTH:
People keep defending their betrayers. Many willingly celebrate these wildly wicked weird witchcraft holidays from the weathered old Roman religion of rapists. Are these holidays the beautiful side of evil?...Well, evil, is still evil no matter how it is served to you. The Lord God shall a put curse on all who celebrate these holidays of Hell. You and your children' s children shall suffer plague and death. The Holy Bible explains this fact.
Private Investigator Sinne
TruthTeller878 9 months ago
@BLCFrenzy In addition to things like software modern scholars have an additional 400 years worth of scholarly work, manuscript discoveries and new linguistic data to draw from. Obviously any translator must be fluent in Greek and Hebrew, just as true today, but proving one group is more "gifted" or "brilliant" is tough, evidence please? If 1611 English developed from Middle English in what sense is it more "original" than modern English or do you dispute its Old/Middle English origins?
FBCWillowsPastor 9 months ago
@FBCWillowsPastor - Who says that they have mroe resources? and who also says that Modern translators are anywhere near the translators of the King James Version? Thmen - again - were highly gifted and educated in ancient languages, several of them being fluent in the ancient tongues. My basis is history itself. And what I mean by original English is just that: original English. The Canterbury tales were written in Middle English - A distinctly different language than that of the KJV-AV.
BLCFrenzy 9 months ago