TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?
Top Comments
All Comments (563)
-
People are looking at these theories based on the fact that the "consumer" level of technology/computers is the same as government/scientific level... its not.. wake up.. we had people in space in the 60's on space craft power by less than whats in a modern day cellphone..
start thinking outside the box.
-
While unlikely that the planes were CGI, it is possible that someone knew that the attacks were going to happen and, for their own interests, chose to do nothing.
-
@dreamdiction What's the "REAL evidence" for the 9/11 inside job?
-
you should watch final cut, they left out most of the debunked theories.
-
@MegaYeshua33 the second version is better, but it doesnt matter which one, they both have exellent info
-
@brandonwrightmusic witch version?
-
i dont know about all this cgi stuff, regardless I know that 9/11 was a big scam, watch loose change, it will tell you everything
-
@gloom2 idiot
-
Oh the cgi plane! So no need to attach a bomb underneath the plane then.



All this "no planes" bullshit is disinfo designed to distract attention from the REAL evidence for the 9/11 Inside Job.
dreamdiction 3 months ago 11
The slight picture break up you call static is almost never caused by static on the tape inside the camera, there are devices to neutralize that, but is usually caused by an edit that has ot been cleaned up or by a slowing or stopping of the tape for a moment. It can also be caused by a blow to the camera, even a heavy hand tap.
hs0zcw 4 months ago 9