Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Don't Panic - Flaws In Catastrophic Global Warming Forecasts

While the science of how CO2 and other greenhouse gases causes warming is fairly well understood, this core process only results in limited, nuisance levels of global warming. Catastrophic warming ...  
 
Customize

More From: coyoteblog

Loading...

QuickList(0)

115 ratings
Sign in to rate
18,870 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (184)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
ozricbish (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So, let me get this right....
CO2 isn't a problem with regards to the planet getting hotter....its just that at 500 plus ppm we'll just suffocate to death.....cool..
moddy82 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nope you won't find it, because unlike the IPCC, there is no funding for criticism. Also, I have never seen anyone of the official side (IPCC and Research Institutions) doing a honest debate with real rational sceptics (and not some FOX anchors)...
hatusage (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Have a read of Michael Crichtons book ...'state of fear" ......
mainusch (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
If the earth's climate were dominated by positive feedbacks, then it would have run away eons ago, and we wouldn't even be here to have this discussion. It obviously hasn't. It obviously isn't.
eburgess8338 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The video states that: "Climate scientists assume that earth's climate is dominated by positive feedbacks."

Isn't it possible that positive feedbacks may occur on a more immediate timescales (decades to centuries) while still allowing the negative feedbacks to dominate over longer timescales (e.g. tens of thousands of years)?

Also, what about the possibility that sensitivity is damped by carbon sinks (e.g. oceans) that are now losing their capacity to absorb CO2?
moddy82 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes, and no, higher order immidiate feedbacks are f.e. weather effects, but the underlying lower order feedbacks push it back into its borders... It's difficult to say, because those feedbacks are even less understood than long-term feedbacks. However, on a decadal basis, it might not be so, because Sun-cycles are pre-dominant, here if we follow the recent temperature trends (which are more reliable because of satelite measurement).
FreeAgain2 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Great vid.

5/5.
FreeAgain2 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
See the NIPCC report - (pub June 2009 - 860+ pages) A good read.
DunkerDonko (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Great video. And uhmm.. People that comment, stop writing fucking books. Iv'e seen like 50 comments on this video that looks like a fucking book.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.