Don't Panic - Flaws In Catastrophic Global Warming Forecasts

So, let me get this right....
CO2 isn't a problem with regards to the planet getting hotter....its just that at 500 plus ppm we'll just suffocate to death.....cool..

Nope you won't find it, because unlike the IPCC, there is no funding for criticism. Also, I have never seen anyone of the official side (IPCC and Research Institutions) doing a honest debate with real rational sceptics (and not some FOX anchors)...

Have a read of Michael Crichtons book ...'state of fear" ......

If the earth's climate were dominated by positive feedbacks, then it would have run away eons ago, and we wouldn't even be here to have this discussion. It obviously hasn't. It obviously isn't.

The video states that: "Climate scientists assume that earth's climate is dominated by positive feedbacks."

Isn't it possible that positive feedbacks may occur on a more immediate timescales (decades to centuries) while still allowing the negative feedbacks to dominate over longer timescales (e.g. tens of thousands of years)?

Also, what about the possibility that sensitivity is damped by carbon sinks (e.g. oceans) that are now losing their capacity to absorb CO2?

Yes, and no, higher order immidiate feedbacks are f.e. weather effects, but the underlying lower order feedbacks push it back into its borders... It's difficult to say, because those feedbacks are even less understood than long-term feedbacks. However, on a decadal basis, it might not be so, because Sun-cycles are pre-dominant, here if we follow the recent temperature trends (which are more reliable because of satelite measurement).

Great vid.

5/5.

See the NIPCC report - (pub June 2009 - 860+ pages) A good read.

Great video. And uhmm.. People that comment, stop writing fucking books. Iv'e seen like 50 comments on this video that looks like a fucking book.