Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Re: John Edwards and Bringing About Change

My response to John Edwards Questions "What are you going to do to bring about change?"  
 
Customize

More From: Razela

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

14 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,226 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (25)   Options

Loading...
DukatSG1 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nice to see someone took this seriously and didn't post some snarky non-response. I agree with you btw
brixiafidelis1 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
A politician who HAD to be "approved" by international bankers in the Bilderberg Group in 2004. Oh, tell us ALL about "change."
HiredGunz98 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Edwards charges $55,000 for poverty speech yet you dont call him out on it?
HungryDingo (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Which proves how great the US is. That our poor people actually have things to steal. Your average poor American has a cell phone, a car, cable, internet, nice clothes. I grew up around these "poor" people. Trust me, they had nice things.
seanus2008 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
sure, poor people in this country are rich vs. people in Darfur, but what about outsourcing of production jobs, and corporate welfare - I guess they're ok because poor people here still have old beaters and velcro K-mart shoes
HungryDingo (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I oppose corporate welfare, and jobs simply are going to be outsourced no matter what we do. Someone in China will do it for a fraction of what it would take to pay an American, nothing will stop this unless Americans start accepting the same pay as Chinese workers will, which won't and shouldn't happen. Like I said, most "poor" people have designed labels and cell phones, not K-mart shoes.
HungryDingo (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If democrats want to fight poverty what's stopping them? They can give all their extra spending money to random poor people if they supposedly care so much. They don't have to steal it from rich republicans.
 0
Marked as spam
should separate all voters.
religion has NO business in politics and anyone who brings it up should be thrown down the steps of the capitol (for starters).
EpicOmen (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yeah, um, and people who believe in violence should be shot.
j0eg0d (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
NO IT SHOULDN'T, but the fact is - it most certainly does. When would be the last time we didn't have that stereotypical President ? Other than James Buchanan; they were all married, they all attend Church, all white men, they all had children (except for Buchanan & James Polk) and they all had pets. It's part of the campaign stragedy now, because America wouldn't vote for an unmarried atheist Chinese/American woman.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.