Al Sharpton vs Tavis Smiley pt1 Barack Obama & the Black Agenda

Civil rights leader Al Sharpton got into a spirited back and forth with TV talk show host Tavis Smiley on his radio show on Monday Feb 23 2010.. The dispute was over President Obama and whether or not he was going to have a Black Agenda. Tavis felt Sharpton and Charles Olgetree who was also on the phone weren't pressing Obama enough.. Sharpton felt Tavis was off the mark for his approach and accused him of 'distorting their words..

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Al Sharpton
• Tavis Smiley
• davey D
• davey D TV
• Civil rights
• President Obama
• black Agenda
• race relations
• tavis Talks
• political beef

[shieldsff]

The issue is marriage in WESTERN SOCIETY. How misguided &convoluted Mr.Sharpton is on this topic In fact, he opposes not merely same sex marriage but homosexuality in general as a matter of faith&morality. His argument that his opponent's position is invalid because he addresses gay marriage specifically is illogical. Mr. Sharpton appears inconsistent&lacking in credibility to argue on behalf of gay marriage in the same way as if he were to argue that adultery or fornication doesn't matter.

[Waluigi101]

@Aminah6623 Except genetically there is no significant change in races beyond aesthetics, especially since brain plasticity is a big thing in humans, so I don't compare black and white as that's useless. I compare current white and black cultures and criticize accordingly, and ultimately criticize the extreme racial collectivism which that only divides.

Those payment systems are awful and based off of pyramid debt. Even if I wanted out I'd be forced to fund the system in taxes now.

[Waluigi101]

@Aminah6623 Percentages are far more better for looking at cultural trends, chief, and looking at raw numbers when the sampling size is eschew is pure idiocy, often used to justify an idiotic point. The regions imposed slavery through unconstitutional laws, so it was cemented as a result of government. Stopping people from being hung and punishing those who do is already covered, creating specific rights for groups and not all humans leads to divide. Your points are used and terrible.

[Aminah6623]

@Waluigi101 By the way, the way you think is eliteness. Your comparison of blacks and whites speaks loudly about how you think. For someone who doesn't trust information provided by media, you sure as hell like referring to it when you think it's in your favor (LOL). I don't know how old you are, but if you hate government so much, refuse your medicare and social security checks when you reach retirement to prove you hate government. That would be a real statement.

[Aminah6623]

@Waluigi101...You don't know anything about stats, buddy. By the way, I am not a dumbass who thinks government can solve all problems; neither do I think there is no role for government. Shit the U.S. government didn't always protect its black or female citizens, remember that shit. Hell, the Irish and Italians were treated like shit in the U. S of A, but government should protect all of its citizens. Whites hung Italians from trees just like they did blacks. Government should let that go?

[Waluigi101]

@Aminah6623 And now we've dipped into responses with no substance anyways.

Of course, you probably think that despite what decades have proven and what stats show, there needs to be more government in order to stop this institutionalized racism and whatnot. That's the perfect mindset to keep elites in power.

[Aminah6623]

@Waluigi101...oh boy, you just don't get it. it's ok. you suck anyway.

[Waluigi101]

@Aminah6623 Obviously with raw numbers more white people are on welfare, but even by your own data you've provided it covers a larger percentage of the black community. Otherwise calls to cut welfare privileges wouldn't be responded to with cries of racism. Statistical analysis on how many of what race are under welfare should be tossed out anyways, it's just more racial separation. End affirmative action, end government involvement in these affairs, let people merge or not through their wills.

[Waluigi101]

@Aminah6623 More than half? Guess where that was a decade ago? It's on a downward trend, moron.

And sure is cherry picking my videos. I don't care if someone uses an archaic phrase like nigger, it's a buzzword to manipulate people so the more that don't care about it the better.

[Aminah6623]

@Waluigi101...the population is all people on welfare; then a randomized sample is taken of the population of people who are on welfare. The statistics (results of the sample, fucktard) are then disaggregated (separated, asshole) by race. Most black and white people are employed. No need to thank me for the Statistics 101