Rubik's Cube Solved Using Fridrich Method

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
66,420
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 14, 2007

Sorry to break the news to the YouTube cubing community, but I WILL NOT be making a Fridrich tutorial any time soon if ever. It will simply be too much work for me, and I don't think I am good enough at/know enough about the Fridrich method. If you are serious about learning the Fridrich method then please don't be lazy, and just go to Jessica Fridrich's website, or any other site that teaches Fridrich (I like Dan Harris' site the most); and take the time to LEARN MORE ALGORITHMS. Learning more cases is THE BEST WAY to get faster, especially F2L cases.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (elimescube)

  • Was that last algorithm one of the 21 pll algs that are out there? bc i use the beginners fridrich and i cant go from that position to a solve with one step.

  • The last algorithm is a PLL case. It is a 3 edge cycle, also known as U permutation.

  • lol aint it cheating??

    u need to scramble properly than you can call solve the rubik cube solving it??

  • The maximum depth of the Rubik's cube is currently proven to be no more than 22 moves for ANY given combination. That means from ANY scrambled state a powerful enough piece of cube solving software could complete the cube in 22 moves or less. The scrambling algorithm I used was 25 moves long and when I solved it I did not by any means backtrack the scramble (you can see I take much longer than 25 moves to solve it. Long story short: I scrambled it exactly right, and no I did not cheat.

  • @elimescube actually, god's number (the maximum possible moves to solve any of the 43 quitillion combinations of a 3x3x3) is 20.

  • @J0hnnyH4ck3r When I made that comment 2 years ago 22 was still the minimum we could calculate. We've taken two more steps since then :P

see all

All Comments (129)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i dont understand where i start and what to do? i need to scrambel and usethe algorithm from the begin????

  • @elimescube

    u perm? no that was T perm

  • you don't know much OLL.. right?

  • That's not the whole fridrich because you used 3 look oll lol (2 look). 

  • lol you dont know the oll?? hahah!!! thats not a complete fridrich method!!!!

  • he should learn 1 look oll...

  • you should learn 2 look oll

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more