Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Thai Airways Airbus A340-500 Takeoff from JFK

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
203,835
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 24, 2006

Thai Airways Airbus A340-500 Takeoff from JFK to BKK

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (chrisrad79)

  • @monster29456 No they are not

Top Comments

  • @chickendippers1997 Do you know what you are talking about? Obviously not. Watch a 747's wing during take-off or turbulence

see all

All Comments (372)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @upiluften

    For example the A340-300 (A343) has only a few kN more than he needed to obtain permission. So with underpowered I did mean, that the A343 is really weak.

    So I'm of course not a dumb-ass who thought that the aircrafts are too much underpowered an weren't allowed to fly.

  • @bieberhater555 Expensive. Very expensive, and low yields (not much money made).

  • @TheTrucker302 Because it was a long takeoff roll. The A340's takeoff rolls generally are longer than a fully-loaded 77W's. However, there is no such thing as "underpowered." If an aircraft was underpowered, it would never leave the ground, or achieve certification. That being said, it is true that many of the A340 series aircraft have lower thrust/lb.

  • @Griskabora

    It´s only a normal heavy take off because the plane is full of kerosine. (14.000km flight)

    So, why is it underpowered?

  • dang how you that? everytime i tried to video a take off the airplane lady always like "IS THAT A CAMCORDER?! HOLY MOTHER O FUCK YOURE GONNA KILL US ALL! ! AAAA"

  • Flew power take off !

  • HEY??!!! WHY CAN'T THAI KEEP GOING TO JFK??!!

  • That was a very underpowered takeoff!

  • Taking off from JFK RW 4R

  • @norske250 No its not, ive flown with both A332 and A333, not bumbier when compared to other airplanes.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more