Thai Airways Airbus A340-500 Takeoff from JFK
Uploader Comments (chrisrad79)
Top Comments
-
@chickendippers1997 Do you know what you are talking about? Obviously not. Watch a 747's wing during take-off or turbulence
All Comments (372)
-
For example the A340-300 (A343) has only a few kN more than he needed to obtain permission. So with underpowered I did mean, that the A343 is really weak.
So I'm of course not a dumb-ass who thought that the aircrafts are too much underpowered an weren't allowed to fly.
-
@bieberhater555 Expensive. Very expensive, and low yields (not much money made).
-
@TheTrucker302 Because it was a long takeoff roll. The A340's takeoff rolls generally are longer than a fully-loaded 77W's. However, there is no such thing as "underpowered." If an aircraft was underpowered, it would never leave the ground, or achieve certification. That being said, it is true that many of the A340 series aircraft have lower thrust/lb.
-
It´s only a normal heavy take off because the plane is full of kerosine. (14.000km flight)
So, why is it underpowered?
-
dang how you that? everytime i tried to video a take off the airplane lady always like "IS THAT A CAMCORDER?! HOLY MOTHER O FUCK YOURE GONNA KILL US ALL! ! AAAA"
-
Flew power take off !
-
HEY??!!! WHY CAN'T THAI KEEP GOING TO JFK??!!
-
That was a very underpowered takeoff!
-
Taking off from JFK RW 4R
-
@norske250 No its not, ive flown with both A332 and A333, not bumbier when compared to other airplanes.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are a340 takeoffs always really bumby cuz evry vid i c on a340 takeoffs its always bumpier than others
monster29456 9 months ago
@monster29456 No they are not
chrisrad79 9 months ago 4