Tom Campbell: Accessing Information from History: Art, Music, and the Afterlife
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (twcjr44)
All Comments (71)
-
@suddenlyitsobvious Well, then do it for the multitude of others. And, good luck again, sir.
-
'And, please let me know when you've completed your TOE replete with the book and recorded public seminar posted on youtube.' Why? If you can't deal with a few boxes on a thread, how could you possibly deal with larger volumes of info?
-
@suddenlyitsobvious Well, I'm sorry things didn't work out for you. However, thanks for taking the time out to at least give it a try. And, please let me know when you've completed your TOE replete with the book and recorded public seminar posted on youtube. In the meantime, I'll take the broken chain links on your homepage as a hint that it's still in the formative stages. Good luck, sir.
-
*not a single post from you that IS NOT intellectually dishonest, meaning they all are.
-
'funny how you use those words in quotes 'good guy', 'credible guy' when I never used them at all' Quotation marks aren't only used to refer to someone else's words, they can be used to convey the notion of an approximation.
While I agree that one could make the inference you're making, quite frankly, it is so perfectly obvious that they aren't specifically your words and it would be so pointless to misquote you in this manner that one wonders why you immediately jump...
-
@suddenlyitsobvious funny how you use those words in quotes 'good guy', 'credible guy' when I never used them at all. Talk about a fragmented view of reality, sir.
I think you need to re-read what I actually said. I don't have time to guide you through this conversation all over again. Pretty much the rest of your "argument" is "compromised" considering you don't know how to read very well.
Anything else?
-
...the feelgood mood you wanted to explore this with. You simply prefer to NOT know. Isn't this a remarkable stance when the actually topic of interest is PRECISELY information and knowledge and how to access it? Would you say that access to accurate info from the perspective of a reduced framework utilized by a willful individual is GREATER or LESSER, than the access obtained by another individual who is NOT refusing to include certain data from his perceptions? Hmmm?
2:16:31
Tom Campbell: Calgary Theory only (Sat) 1/3by twcjr4413,110 views- 57:21
Tom Campbell: The Evolution of Humanity March 2011by twcjr443,009 views
- 16:09
Tom Campbell: Around The World: MBT Questions #1 UKby twcjr441,370 views
- 1:50:41
Tom Campbell Unity North Atlanta 2/3 Better Science Better Livingby twcjr442,210 views
- 2:11:56
Tom Campbell & Anthony Peake - Consciousness Creates Realityby illskamsarchive1,763 views
- 1:19:27
Tom Campbell: Virtual Reality: Why It's A Better Model Than String Theory and Holographic Universeby twcjr444,622 views
- 1:41:15
Tom Campbell: The Future of Physics and Humanityby twcjr443,497 views
- 1:49
Steve Jobs tells us a secretby yuize1,724,196 views
- 17:19
Explaining the Double Slit Experiment -Physicist Thomas Campbellby metaRising945 views
- 4:51
And Can It Be That I Should Gainby Christisinn5,621 views
- 54:35
Tom Campbell's Fireside Chat 1/3by twcjr442,404 views
- 9:42
Thomas Campbell on Emotions and Suicideby MBTEVENTS5,656 views
- 52:09
The Nature of Reality, Consciousness & Evolution with Tom Campbell - Part 3 of 3by EvitaOchel1,548 views
- 13:22
Kreativität, intuitives Wissen und Kunst - Tom Campbellby matrixwissen234 views
- 2:09:00
Tom Campbell: Calgary Theory only (Sat) 2/3by twcjr444,974 views
- 1:59:13
Tom Campbell: Calgary Apps only (Sun) 3/3by twcjr441,959 views
- 2:42
How To Cook Perfect Chicken Breast Every time!by LIFTtrainingSTUDIOS141,875 views
- 1:22
University of Calgary Professor Tom Flanagan calls for assassination of Wikileaks Directorby pmmccurdy1,702 views
- 49:35
Tom Campbell's Fireside Chat 3/3by twcjr441,120 views
- 1:48:10
Tom Campbell MBT Forum March 2011 Pt 1/5by twcjr446,958 views
Then everything is art. I can bet, that whatever I make, draw, or sing, will EVENTUALLY get to someone on emotional level. Maybe 1 out of milion, but it will speak to someone.
I think it is not u good definition of art.
borisZG55 3 weeks ago
@borisZG55,
It only gets to be called art if you make interesting, emotionally satisfying, and inspirational -- otherwise it is just everyday junk. What's art, is in the eye of the beholder.
twcjr44 3 weeks ago
@twcjr44
That is what i ment. Maybe someone will find "everyday junk" emotional insipring. So is it art ? A have somhow different description of art. Maybe you will agree.Something is art, if it touches you in the way that artis ment it. For instance, artist paints a picture of Clown, but he felt "sad, nostalgic.." while painting it. If you can sense that emotion aout of painting, then i think it is art. If you say ITS GREAT HAPPY PICTURE WITH CLOWN, then it is not art.
borisZG55 3 weeks ago
@borisZG55,
It can be defined both ways. 1) As personal to the consumer. Art is a product that is produced specifically for others to appreciate and find value in. All will not find value in the same art product. If you don't appreciate it or find value in it, then to you it is not art to you. 2) As personal to the artist. Art is produced by an artist because it means something to the artist. Art is both. Since we are all IUOCs living in our own reality, everything is personal.
twcjr44 3 weeks ago
I seem to get the idea that in order become love, one has to do this at the "being" level. I am personally trying to do things more for others than before, but wouldn't this just be changing on the surface? Do you just "get it" at the being level at some point after doing good deeds?
bboystunts101 1 month ago
@bboystunts101,
Yes, that sometimes works if the desire/intent is to change at the being level. The Intent (motivation) driving what you do is key. There is a difference between acting good and being good. Turning the first into the second requires a strong intent at the being level to do so.
twcjr44 1 month ago