HyperV Vs. VM Ware ESXi side by side comparison

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• HyperV
• Vs.
• VM
• Ware
• ESXi
• side
• by
• comparison

[ashabbas]

I'm still trying to decide to move forward with Hyper-v or ESXi. As far installation, 20-30min difference is not a deciding factor. Once everything is running I don't think most people will care.

[2Shiksha]

yes you correct, you can not make decision on this difference. You need to look over your requirement, budget and what software you use.

[ashabbas]

This is a bit outdated. Hyper-v gives you a simple gui for network setup.

[sje8670]

ashabbas- Clearly you haven't spent much time trying to deploy Hyper-V. VMware, and especially vSphere 4.0, is so much easier to deploy, manage, and work with. vmware is a far superior product, and there is no debate

[2Shiksha]

Trying to do, but little bit busy now. Thanks

[2Shiksha]

Yup, but the network settings in video only for installation of software. But when you go for virtualize the application then you will get GUI on both Virtual Application.

[trdrvr2]

@icewhite11 Hyper V has the same capabilities. Cheers!

[drlefteris]

@trdrvr2 TRUE

[drlefteris]

My opinion is Hyper -V for small business 10 Servers And Vmware for Data Centers all this in this video is just for the installation VM ware it is better from Hyper v ???? (you cannot compare vmware is specific working on Virtual environment) HV-because is for free as a role on your Ms Server 2008 R2 ..

[trdrvr2]

Right on. The Bank I used to work at bought three dell r610s with a massive amount of memory and 2 6 core processors each..... before I left they were 85% virtual. Using Hyper V core...... I don't think VMWare is easier but I dont think Hyper V is easier either....... Except on the pocket book. There are some advantages to buying data center edition though..... the biggest one being that it has unlimited virtual licensing for the machine its installed on.

[ashabbas]

@trdrvr2 Yep! I had a post earlier that mentioned we were using the free version. In order to have high availability you need to have fail over clustering and the only server versions that offer that is Enterprise and Hyper-V Server (core) as you probably know. We've been running it just fine on two Dell servers for about a year and we're adding in two more to the cluster this week. We have about 8 guest machines running. It has proven to be simple and easy to manage for our environment.

[trdrvr2]

@ashabbas hyper v core is free. You do not need the full blown server to use hyper v. Further, if you are going to use live migration... obviously you're going to have a hardware cost. At any rate MS Hyper V is free and has most of the same functionality as the PAID expensive version of vmware vSphere. Just make sure you're either fiber channel or iSCSI capable. CHEERS!

[MrRivii]

still Vmware is much much easier....

[gooble69]

@kennylyuda

"VMware doesn't push out patches" Dude, Google "Vmware Update Manager" and tell me what the purpose of that is?

[gooble69]

I'm a VMware fan, and this video started out with promise, but whatever thunder you wanted to bring to VMware evaporates with your fanboy approach to your commentary. Yes VMware does more, but it also costs more." OMGZ another rebootz!!!" does contributes nothing to an objective comparison.

[Koman92040]

This video is very date Microsoft now makes Hper-v available as it's own OS