130,413
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (97)
-
Great. Googles service is several years old, while Nokias is brand new. Would you give Nokia some time to develop? It's 3D mapping technique is clearly more sophisticated and better then Googles or Microsofts is.
Although, Google has still the higher image resolution, which makes it still my first choice.
-
ahahahah, si sente troppo l' accento italiano. comunque funzione molto bella, complimenti
-
This is the guy that races Ricky Bobby!
-
I don't want to share my route.... :-(
-
She is gorgeous!
-
a bit tooooooooooooooooooo REAL!!!!
-
Right now I am in Berlin, but I can look up a pizzeria in Rome where I will be next week. Ah, I see, where the project money goes. :P
-
@VoguishArts What ever to Facebook and Yahoo? Oh yeah :)
Loading...
Google already has this, it can do 3d of major sities and towns. Nokia does the same but both companies do not have one thing. 3d ON SMALL TOWNS AND UNKOWN CITIES
2197xhorxh 3 months ago 24
The basic difference is that 3d models on Google Earth is made using sketchup. While Nokia used C3's aerial mapping technology, a tech used in missile guidance by the military.
Jabid21 3 months ago 16